Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Will Obama scrap the Homeland Security dept ?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:36 PM
Original message
Will Obama scrap the Homeland Security dept ?
I remember hearing some time ago that Obama intends to separate FEMA from HLS, and put it back where it was pre Bush, after which there'd be a more effective internal security operation to replace the current model. If that is the case, maybe all this reconcilliation w/ Lieberman is just a smart looking move before he pulls the plug on the need for a HLS Senate committee. :shrug:

I'm betting there's lots more deep thought and planning going on here than meets the eye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. From your keyboard to who ever is in charge. I'm very disappointed.
I don't doubt that Obama is stratergizing and I like that. Between Reid and Lieberman I'm too angry to think straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. My opinion of Obama would go even higher if he did
He could save bazillions of dollars and cut off Loserman's nuts at the same time.

And he could do it all with a big smile on his face.

You're right, there's a lot of maneuvering behind the scenes we'll never know about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. That's exactly what I'm feeling.
I wish I could find the occassion and content of this idea, but I'm almost positive I heard or read that Obama planned to rework the whole agency to make it more efficient and workable.

I hope I'm right.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nnnnnnnnope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's not like Joe did anything important with the committee
Since he's made it useless, no need for it.

Fingers crossed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Never. It has huge amounts of money. Politicians love slush funds
that can be earmarked. HSD can be used to bring home the pork just like DoD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Doubtful. But I suspect he will rework it greatly. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. Now there's a thought.
Interesting concept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. It can be made useful if competent people run it and the dept. is reorganized
I don't like the people currently running the Department of Education, but that does not mean that we should scrap the agency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. The establishment of HLS was done in a rush
and basically shoved down the throat of a frightened Congress like much of the post 9/11 screw ups. I agree that it doesn't mean it's not needed, but it's worthless in it's current form. Just ask the victims of Katrina....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. If nothing else. change the name to National Security or something other
than "Homeland Security". It sounds like the FATHERLAND stuff of Nazi Germany.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I agree on the name, and then no chairmanship for joementum. tee hee hee...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. PLEASE make it so #1. (TNG reference) That would BE SWEET...then no chairmanship!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. even if DHS was eliminated, it doesn't mean that there wouldn't be an HS Committee
First, its unlikely that DHS would be eliminated. Doing so would be costly and disruptive at this point. DHS needs to be fixed, but it was created by tossing together a bunch of agencies from around the government, some of which didn't fit very well where they were. So just "undoing" it wouldn't make sense and wouldn't necessarily make anything run more smoothly. Second, the jurisdiction of the HS Committee isn't directly linked to the jurisdiction of the DHS. INdeed, for example, the charter of the HS Committee expressly excludes from its jurisdiction matters relating to the Coast Guard, the Transportation Security Administration, the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center or the Secret Service; the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service; the immigration functions of the United States Customs and Border Protection or the United States Immigration and Custom Enforcement or the Directorate of Border and Transportation Security.

Second, if the HS Committee is considered such a prime committee, why did the repubs let Susan Collins have the chairmanship when they controlled the Senate -- she's hardly an A-teamer for the repubs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. Of course, there's more
than meets the eye here..we just have to wait and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. I wish he and Congress would
Put TSA under the Dept. of Transportation, Customs under Treasury, ICE under Justice, FEMA by itself, etc., etc. That creation was the epitome of everything repukes claimed they were against (big gov't) yet cheered on anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC