Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Simple fact is, if Obama had wanted Joe gone he would be gone...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:37 PM
Original message
Simple fact is, if Obama had wanted Joe gone he would be gone...
This is part of the larger Obama strategy of changing the way things are done in Washington, and for him I suspect intramural spitball contests distract from that...

Lieberman is effectively castrated despite keeping his chairmanship. He knows he is on a very short leash, and is now irrelevent from a policy perspective. I think you will see Lieberman bending over backwards to accomodate Obama's agenda. And Obama gets it out of the headlines...

As satisfying as it would be to see Joe get screwed, I understand why Obama would prefer it this way...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yep. Obama is a skilled politician. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. There's no reason to think he's been castrated. Au contraire.
He's just been told he can publicly call the President Elect a terrorist, with no consequences. That's a damn lot of power for a member of the US Senate. That's why he had that shit-eating grin during the news conference. He won. Again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gravity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Lieberman never had balls to begin with
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'll buy that. ...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. Strategic mistake
Rewarding your enemies has never made sense since humans first hunted rabbits with wooden sticks. He's not only trying to change Washington but human nature. His rivals will view this as weakness. Both home and abroad. I think he is going to be in for a few rough years. Welcome to the major leagues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
S_E_Fudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. We'll see...
Every decision is a gamble...

But it isn't an unreasonable one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I hope I'm wrong nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Good point. And we are talking about subhumans here. Republicans.
God knows waht they are capable of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. He's more useful to us this way than as an enemy
I don't give a rat's ass about Lieberman's chairmanship if we can get Obama's agenda passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alter Ego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. I don't think Obama honestly gives a shit.
Lieberman played the wrong hand and lost big--and you cannot tell me that there won't be resentment among his colleagues and an utter refusal to support him when he runs again in 2012 from many of them.

Obama knows that if we don't have 50 or 60 senators Lieberman is just one whiny little bitch rather than a whiny little bitch who can control the agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's not like he can't be stripped of his chair later if he doesn't play ball.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. Lieberman is not on a SHORT FUCKING LEASH
Is that the meme for today? I keep seeing this short leash crap. We just let Lieberman know he can do whatever the fuck he wants and there will be no consequences. Short leash my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. I sure hope that President-Elect Obama is willing to pour everything he can,
resource-wise, into the Georgia Senate race; otherwise, this entire capitulation exercise was a complete waste of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenEyedLefty Donating Member (708 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. Lieberman has been rendered irrelevant
If Obama is as interested in bi-partisanship as he promises to be, then he won't *need* Lieberman's 60th vote.

I'd also wager that "homeland security" as a concept will change over the next 4 years as well. Lieberman's future as a committee chairperson is not guaranteed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. K&R
I don't know if I agree that this disarms Lieberman, but it would appear that settling scores is not an especially high priority for Obama, and his judgement to date has convinced me to give him some slack on his priorities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC