AlinPA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 03:30 PM
Original message |
It is not clear to me why Lieberman would want to caucus with Democrats. |
|
I understand wanting to be the chair of the Homeland Security Committee. What else does he gain by being in the caucus when he fits better with republicans? None could trust him now (yes, Reid says he trusts him but nobody believes that stupid statement).
|
Oceansaway
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message |
1. he must swallow....n/t |
PBS Poll-435
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message |
2. On every issue except War on Terra' and Irack, Joe is a Dem |
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message |
3. you don't understand why he'd prefer being in the majority? |
|
not to mention that much as I detest Lieberman and wish he would just go away, he votes with the dems 90% of the time.
|
AlinPA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
12. With all but a few despising him, it's hard to see how he can want that kind of life. |
Larkspur
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Because the GOP really don't like Lieberman and they have nothing to offer him now |
|
The GOP only liked using Lieberman as a mole in the Dem Caucus for them. During the general election campaign Dick Cheney went in and out of Lieberman's office. Wonder what they were talking about?
|
AlinPA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. He will continue to be the mole. |
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The Security Industrial Complex is the next Military Industrial Complex.
|
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 03:35 PM
Response to Original message |
7. because being in the minority pary sucks? |
AlinPA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
14. Being despised by nearly everyone of the Democrats can make his life miserable. |
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
17. i'd love to know what will go on behind the scene, anyhow i still feel very worried about |
|
Edited on Tue Nov-18-08 03:45 PM by chimpsrsmarter
the info his committee handles, i don't trust him as far as i could kick him.
|
Barack_America
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 03:35 PM
Response to Original message |
8. He gains the last shred of hope for reelection in 2012. |
indepat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 03:35 PM
Response to Original message |
9. To fuck 'em royally, to fuck 'em over, to mess with their minds, to torpedo initiatives, to screw |
|
them over, to talk them into giving Israel everything Israel wants and supporting every Israeli action, these just for starters. :P
|
Bake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message |
10. It's all about preserving his Chairmanship of HS |
|
That's all he has left.
Bake
|
UnrepentantUnitarian
(887 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 03:38 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Yeah, it does seem like his bestest buddies are... |
|
on the other side of the aisle. Honestly, I thought Lindsey Graham and John McCain had all become surgically attached to him in recent months. I look forward to the day when Joe the Liarman will be sitting at home writing books or working for Blackwater.
|
Kokonoe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message |
13. He can not get elected as a republican. eom |
BootinUp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Not sure of the actual statistics but I keep seeing 90% |
|
of tht time he votes with Democratic caucus. Maybe that has something to do with it.
|
AlinPA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. He could vote the same way on those issues as a republican. |
Ino
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message |
18. He spies for the Repukes (nt) |
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 03:45 PM
Response to Original message |
19. If the GOP were in the majority, he'd caucus with them. |
|
It's all about power. Committee chairs have power. :shrug:
|
PBS Poll-435
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
21. The GOP was in the majority. |
|
For four years of the war in Iraq.
Joe ran, instead, for the Dem nom in 04.
|
Pyrzqxgl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message |
20. Thats just it. I don't think Liebs fits real well with either caucus. |
|
He votes with the Democrats a lot on domestic issues & the Republicans on foreign policy (particularly when it involves the middle east, Israel, and such. I think we here at DU make a lot more of this guy than he's worth. He's a joke. We've had people in our party that are a hell of a lot more conservative than Joe. We still do. We need to limit our Lieb rants to about one a week. Connecticut will take care of him in time. Let them.
|
Critters2
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:56 PM
Response to Original message |
22. Couldn't get elected as a Repug from CT. It took Repugs plus a few Dems |
|
to get him this job. Repugs alone couldn't pull it off. And then who would represent AIPAC?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Apr 20th 2024, 09:13 AM
Response to Original message |