Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Holder Prosecuted corrupt Democrat Dan Rostenkowski (house and means)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 04:34 PM
Original message
Holder Prosecuted corrupt Democrat Dan Rostenkowski (house and means)


More on Holder:


Rostenkowski's political career was shattered in 1994, when he was indicted on corruption charges for his key role in the House post office scandal. He was forced to step down from all Congressional leadership positions. In elections later that year, Rostenkowski lost his seat and retired from political life. Charges against Rostenkowski included keeping "ghost" employees on his payroll, using Congressional funds to buy gifts such as chairs and ashtrays for friends, and trading in officially purchased stamps for cash at the House post office<1>. In 1996, he pleaded guilty to reduced charges of mail fraud. He was fined and was sentenced to 17 months in prison, of which he served 15. Rostenkowski was pardoned in Dec. 2000 by US President Bill Clinton.

Rostenkowski's downfall in 1994 was portrayed by Republicans as emblematic of Democratic corruption. The scandal helped fuel the Republican victory in the House, led by Newt Gingrich and his Contract with America. "The rise and fall of Dan Rostenkowski tracks the rise and fall of Democrats in the House," concludes Richard E. Cohen in his book on Rostenkowski<2> . "It is a story of power, accomplishments, and, ultimately, failure and humiliation." Rostenkowski was defeated by Republican attorney Michael Patrick Flanagan by a margin of eight points.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Rostenkowski

http://www.answers.com/topic/eric-h-holder-jr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. He's qualified and a smart guy. But his confirmation will be tough
Edited on Tue Nov-18-08 05:15 PM by BrentTaylor
This is a battle the Repukes will want to fight. If for no other reason they get a chance to make Clinton look bad again. The Mark Rich stuff is going to be aired out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Waxman thought the pardon stunk too
So did many others including me. But it seems Holder was kept out of the loop
or so he claimed.


http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politics/2004457941_apholderobama.html?syndication=rss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. MSNBC's Pete Williams claims
that the Obama team has been floating the idea to Senate Republicans for the past week to make sure there wouldn't be a huge problem with the confirmation. The pubs said that they will want to ask some questions about the pardon, but they likely wouldn't block the confirmation. Not that I trust Senate Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. If I remember correctly the last time Holder was being questioned about him
The Dems were just as tough on him as the Repukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC