matcom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:17 PM
Original message |
A Different Take On The LIEberman Vote Today |
|
Folks, they have him by the balls.
I have no doubt that Reid et al negotiated a LOT with all members AND Holy Joe.
See, Joe backed McLame knowing that if he won, Joe was politically safe - FOREVER.
He put ALL of his eggs in that basket. He didn't believe we would elect a black man and he KNEW he would be heavily rewarded.
Then, the unthinkable happened to him. There is your only motive.
I will bet the house that the Dem Leadership "negotiated" with Joe. They told him in VERY specific terms that he owes them his ASS and I'll bet the exact words used were, "You WILL vote and openly SUPPORT x, y AND z, and you WILL do x, y AND z, as CHAIRMAN of that committee. If you fail to do so, the $$ will be POURING into Ned Lamont's campaign faster than you can go on FAUX news and bitch."
Joe is such a little shit weasel that he agreed to save face. THEY.OWN.HIS.ASS.
Sorry, that's all I got left ;)
|
WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:18 PM
Original message |
Actually, I think Lieberman owns them |
|
Sorry, not buying it.
They caved in like craven cowards, just like they did with Bush for the past eight years.
|
Buzz Clik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:20 PM
Original message |
Agreed. Lieberman is a clever politician. |
|
The Dems have proved themselves not-so-clever in the past. I have no reason to believe they "own" Lieberman in any way.
|
Starry Messenger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Thank you for putting it so well. |
|
I'm hiding all the other Lieberman threads except for this one. :)
|
Parche
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Too Bad I Am In TM's Room Right Now |
Ichingcarpenter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Well, I like they way you think |
|
Something behind the scenes doesn't add up and that was Dean's immediate statement. Dean hates Lieberman so I think he knows something we don't.
My fingers are crossed hoping you are right.
|
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
9. Also Durbin and Kerry loathe Lieberman. No way would they speak for that ass unless Obama NEEDED it. |
|
And that it better be something HUGE like Universal healthcare or Iraq withdrawal.
|
Ichingcarpenter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
13. That's what I'm hoping for |
|
I still await Liarman's first appearance on the TV news talk circuit.
|
cliffordu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Yep - After the little talk Obama and he had on the floor of the senate some |
|
months ago, i'll bet Joey don;t want to go to see anyone at the WH after the swearing in....
|
Somawas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Corpsefucking douchehammer should have been booted.
|
LiberalAndProud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:22 PM
Response to Original message |
6. " $$ will be POURING into Ned Lamont's campaign " |
|
I suspect that will be the case regardless of Joe's future behavior, assuming that Ned Lamont runs on the Democratic ticket in 2012. Will Joe run as an Independent again in 2012? If so, I fear a 2006 repeat.
|
AlCzervik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message |
|
i don't hold this against Obama at all but Lieberman is a worry and cannot be trusted, if he manages to do what you wrote in your op and stops going on Faux i'll be thrilled.
|
TheDoorbellRang
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:24 PM
Response to Original message |
8. So... they'll punish him in four years if he doesn't toe the line? |
|
Wow. He's probably shaking in his boots.
|
matcom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
15. HE doesn't HAVE any opponents until 2012 |
|
He's not up for re-election in 2010, Dodd is.
|
rateyes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Why would they want to own a piece of shit? |
|
They are supposed to flush a piece of shit.
|
zulchzulu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message |
12. It's a chess game and Lieberman is cornered |
Larkspur
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:36 PM
Response to Original message |
14. They can't take Lieberman's chair away after the new senate starts next year |
|
unless they get a majority, not sure if it is 2/3rds or just a simple majority, from the ENTIRE Senate. The Repukes will vote to support Lieberman and so will the Bush Dog Dems. So they have NO leverage over Lieberman once the new Senate starts in 2009.
|
Shakespeare
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:38 PM
Response to Original message |
wryter2000
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:40 PM
Response to Original message |
|
If that's the case, it's worth giving in to the little weasel. Given the way our Dems behave, though, I don't know.
|
Dr Fate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:42 PM
Response to Original message |
18. And if he refuses, they will write strongly worded letters... |
|
...and make sure that bloggers cut & paste those strongly worded letters until the next time Reid has to write strongly worded letters about Lieberman.
|
ulysses
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
19. "mister, you don't want to make him word things too strongly. stronger men than you |
|
have had their feelings hurt."
:hi:
|
librechik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message |
20. Seems to me that Lieberman owns THEIR asses |
|
Edited on Tue Nov-18-08 05:54 PM by librechik
all he has to say is, sorry, I'm sleeping late that day when a filibuster arrives. And we would all be begging him and bribing him to please please be the 60.
And he might, if they give him exactly what he wants. Just like what happened today.
All we can do is elect more Dems to the Senate in 2010 so we won't need Joe.
|
matcom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
21. we don't need him today |
|
which is exactly WHY I think this is how it went down
|
MurrayDelph
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-18-08 07:27 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Lieberman is Wormtail (I can see the resemblance, physically and otherwise)
and
Obama is Harry Potter.
But, other than the current resident of the Naval Observatory, I don't know who would be Voldemort.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:52 AM
Response to Original message |