Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton lawyers vetting her for secretary of state

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 10:36 PM
Original message
Clinton lawyers vetting her for secretary of state
CHICAGO – Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton has engaged three prominent lawyers to help President-elect Barack Obama vet her candidacy for secretary of state even as some insiders criticized the pick and advisers to the former first lady said she was weighing whether to take the job if Obama offered it.

Attorneys Cheryl Mills, David Kendall and Robert Barnett are working with the Obama transition team to review information about the Clintons' background and finances, including Bill Clinton's post-presidential business deals and relationships with foreign governments. All three represented the Clintons on legal matters in the White House, including President Clinton's dalliance with intern Monica Lewinsky that led to his impeachment in 1998.

Officials knowledgeable about the vetting said it has gone smoothly and that both Clintons were cooperating fully.

Bill Clinton already has appeared to take an important step toward smoothing his wife's path to the job.

---

More: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081119/ap_on_go_pr_wh/clinton_secretary_of_state

---

So I'm beginning to see how things went at the meeting with Obama. It's good to see that Hillary isn't afraid of any witch hunt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. "So I'm beginning to see how things went at the meeting with Obama."
How did it go?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. "If I chose you, you must be willing to be vetted."
That's what I'm guessing anyhow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hillary will be SoS if she and Bill cooperate.
Clearly Obama wants her. I think its a good move. The good far outweighs the bad -- IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kick! This is pretty telling if you ask me.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. I still have my misgivings about the job.
She would lose her power base and independence to serve at the pleasure of the president. Does she really want to do that? Well, it's her decision to make.

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. As a patriot
what exactly is wrong with her serving at the pleasure of a Democratic president? If she cares about our country and passes the vetting, she needs to take the job.

Any selfish ideas and talk of power base must be put aside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Why?
I prefer her to be independent and not to have to bow down to anyone. But, it's obviously her decision and she would make a fine SOS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
political_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. I would rather the people doing the vetting be independent of both camps.
Edited on Wed Nov-19-08 01:28 AM by political_Dem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Do you mean tfor all potential cabinet positions? Or just vetting Hillary and Bill? I've said before
that Hillary should be held to the same standard as any other potential cabinet member and go through the same vetting process. However, if you're saying there should be a different vetting process for them, then I vehemently disagree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
political_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. For all the positions. In that way, there is an honest appraisal of each candidate's background.
Isn't that fair?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. As long as it's the same standard for everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. Um....why are her attorneys doing the vetting?
Shouldn't that be done by an independent person (or people)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Hey, Palin exonerated herself from Troopergate.
It's good work if you can get it.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. Gee, nice comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Did you miss this?: "working with the Obama transition team"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
17. Apparently you missed talking point 13b
Hillary doesn't need to be vetted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
18. This is encouraging.
Hopefully, we will see the "Hillary Clinton officially introduced as Obama's selection for SoS" rollout before too long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
19. witch hunt.
Yeah. I'm sure thats exactly what the Obama camp is doing. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC