Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The BIG THREE Automakers are not worth the cost of 12 WEEKS of the war?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Vote2008 Donating Member (599 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 04:33 PM
Original message
The BIG THREE Automakers are not worth the cost of 12 WEEKS of the war?
They want 25 Billion, the war costs 2 billion a week. We can't spend $25 Billion on 6 million jobs but can spend $25 billion on the war the next three months?

And the GOP WANTS to stay in Iraq forever!

Something does not seem right to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. I am for the auto bailout under certain conditions
Employees get stock - lots of it - in return for wage and benefit trade-offs - that means everybody from CEO to the floor. Retool immediately for green, fuel efficient cars. Old stupid failed auto execs must be sacked. Jobs stay in the US - no taking the money and moving abroad to hire slave labor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gizmo1979 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Why do the workers have to
give pay gains back?Most of the jobs are skilled trade,experienced tradesmen are worth every penny.Whoever thinks they make too much money should try it sometime and let me know how it goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. They get a share of the company in return nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not without a workable plan that they should draw up and offer.
Are they worth a blank check? NO.
Could they get somewhere if they were armed with a course of Action to resurrect the Auto Industry? YES.

Problem is that auto industry management ignored the times that we live in and lived high on the SUV hog for a long time. Now, the chicken have come home to roost.

If it wasn't for the jobs that they provide, I'd kick them out on their asses.

They also need to get behind Obama's health Plan proposal....as it would save them and the employees gobs of money.

That's the problem when management are nothing more than a bunch of greedy pigs......it is the people that they manage that end up getting hurt.

They need to offer up a plan that make sense and signifies a plan into the future and not the same ol' same ol'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doityourself Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Yeah they ignored the times..but Americans are as much at fault because many
Americans purchased those gas guzzlers! Now plenty of them act shocked and surprised that SUV's and big pickup trucks were actuallly sold and sold well, at that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Im only for it if the entire middle to upper managment is let go
every single one of them. then they can promote from inside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. If the plan was to get them all making armored vehicles...
they'd be all for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Chris Dodd says "it's asking an awful lot." Harry Reid says "don't expect anything."
We're talking 2.5 months of Iraq. 1/28th of the Wall Street bailout.

I expect it from the GOP...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Perhaps these CEOs are learning that you don't come hat in hand
Edited on Wed Nov-19-08 04:41 PM by FrenchieCat
without a plan in your pocket.

CEOs are paid a lot of money. If they don't understand that you can't get something for nothing,
then they need to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. It's not for nothing
At minimum, it's worth it to keep a state of 10 million people afloat through this recession. To allow a soft landing for an entire region's economy rather than a hard one.

If you want to see a hard landing for the Big Three you are either insane or sadistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I'm not against loans to the Big three..........primarily because of the jobs involved....
My point is that the CEOs should have been armed with specific plans, and they had none.

In otherwords, I am not against them getting a check; I'm just against them getting a BLANK check.

I hope that makes sense.

CEOs make enough to come up with a plan if they wanted to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strawman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. OK. I guess my point is that it really doesn't matter what they say
Edited on Wed Nov-19-08 05:07 PM by Strawman
The bottom line is that money is like a lifeline to working people and alot of people are depending on it.

But you're right. The CEO's were hardly persuasive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samplegirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. Amazing I did not hear any stipulations put upon AIG
when they came begging...should we expect the same from them???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tribetime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. I heard one of their reasons was the industry gave money to Obama's campaign
Edited on Wed Nov-19-08 04:59 PM by Tribetime
and the unions backed Obama. Some republican on CNN yesterday. That's the real reason they want to punish voters in Michigan Indiana Ohio and Pa.. I'll bet if they were located in Mississippi or Alabama it would be a different story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. as with any corporate bailout
there are certain conditions in which i think its alright..

the first of which is the firing of all officers and executives.
the second of which is the elimination of luxury items by the company ... IE multiple private planes and the likes.. you know, shit thats unnecessary.
nothings more bastardly than hearing some corporate douche talk about how they are poor and had to lay off 20,000 people to save money and right afterwards go hop on their company private jet.


i personally think we should start taking over successful businesses such as the oil industry, instead of helping out corporate hacks who couldnt operate themselves outa a paper bag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RollWithIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
14. I guess 12 weeks in Iraq is more important than 3 million American jobs... oh well...
Sad really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC