BritishDemocrat
(22 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-21-08 06:06 PM
Original message |
Do you think Obama and the Dem congress will balance the federal budget? |
|
One of Clinton's greatest achievements was to turn a $300 billion defecit into a $200 billion surplus.
Do you think it's possible to balance the federal budget after Bush's $482 billion defecit?
|
tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-21-08 06:07 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Not in his first term. |
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-21-08 06:10 PM
Response to Original message |
2. The federal budget isn't the national debt |
|
Just saying. I think a lot of people never understood we hadn't dug ourselves out of debt at all. That's why we gave that FICA MONEY away to rich people. So I don't really care if Obama balances the budget if he does it in a way that lets Republicans take my money and gives it to rich people again.
|
robcon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-21-08 06:11 PM
Response to Original message |
3. It would be a tragedy if he did. |
|
Either raising taxes, or reducing domestic speeding in a recession would be foolhardy - and Obama is no fool.
|
mdavies013
(292 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-21-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. You can't keep running up all this red ink... |
|
You need to raise taxes on the rich...they are not contibuting much to the economy.
Lower taxes on 95% of Americans...if they get a couple extra thousand dollars...they are going to spend it and as it was under Clinton the rich will do even better.
You have to cut crap spending...new missle systems, abstenance only education, iraq, etc. We need to increase spending on energy independence projects, roads and bridges, buildings, national park spending. Something that actually creates jobs.
They should also skip giving billions of dollars to banks to pay out in dividends.
|
MidwestTransplant
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-21-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. There is going to be MASSIVE spending in the first couple of years. Has to be done. |
Triana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-21-08 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Yep. Balance the budget later. Right now, it's damage control after... |
|
...the BFEE has gutted the economy.
|
Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-21-08 07:04 PM
Response to Original message |
7. That deficit will be $650 billion at least when revenues collapse. |
Jennicut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-21-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Not right now. there is too much damage done. |
tritsofme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-21-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message |
|
We have inherited a path toward record deficits as far as the eye can see.
|
RichardRay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-21-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Not in the short term. |
|
The amount of stimulus spending that's going to be required to get the economy out of it's current tailspin isn't going to permit the kind of measures (spending cuts, taxation, etc) that will be required to get to a balanced budget.
Yes, I think he might be able to do it, but it's going to be late in his second term, if then.
|
anonymous171
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-21-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Not in this economic climate. |
|
Obama's going to need to spend a lot in order to get this fucking economy started.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:01 PM
Response to Original message |