Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TIME's Mark Halperin: 'Extreme Pro-Obama Media Bias A Disgusting Failure'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:09 PM
Original message
TIME's Mark Halperin: 'Extreme Pro-Obama Media Bias A Disgusting Failure'
Amazing that this guy doesn't remember what they did with Bush for 8 years!


http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1108/15885.html

Media bias was more intense in the 2008 election than in any other national campaign in recent history, Time magazine's Mark Halperin said Friday at the Politico/USC conference on the 2008 election.

"It's the most disgusting failure of people in our business since the Iraq war," Halperin said at a panel of media analysts. "It was extreme bias, extreme pro-Obama coverage."

Halperin, who maintains Time's political site "The Page," cited two New York Times articles as examples of the divergent coverage of the two candidates.
....




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. I googled Mark Halperin. This guy is a right wing extremist - GOPism has been for him....
.. his bread and butter. He sees his good living disappearing so of course he's pissed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. I don't understand. His father, Mort, was a target of Nixon's White House and he sued Nixon!
What the hell is the matter with Mark? His own FATHER was a victim of right wing chicanery!

That guy is anathema to me. His dad, Mort, was a BIG hero to the anti-Vietnam War movement.

Dear god...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Sad isn't it, when good people produce offspring that are
demon spawn! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #20
42. LOL! Demon spawn is a great name for Mark! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
41. Obviously this Mark guy is a first-class idiot. lol nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
68. Mike Wallace / Chris Wallace n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. ***plechhh****
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Halperin is *always* complaining that Republicans are being treated unfairly.
"Conservatives forever braying about a liberal bias in the press received a big boost last month when Mark Halperin, director of ABC's political unit, took to the airwaves with the reddest of Bush partisans -- talkers Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly and Hugh Hewitt -- to voice his heated agreement that the mainstream press treats Republicans unfairly.

Confirming their longstanding fears, Halperin insisted that reporters are "overwhelmingly liberal," they "hate the military," are "blind" to their bias, and should use the closing weeks of the campaign season to "prove" their worth to right-wingers. Suddenly, instead of conservatives working the refs -- badgering journalists with complaints of bias in hopes they would get the benefit of the doubt next time there was a close call in the newsroom -- it was one of the refs (Halperin) working the refs.


...

Halperin signs off on right-wing press conspiracies

Here are some of the Rush Limbaugh-like talking points Halperin echoed during his appearances on conservative outlets:

* "I think we've got a chance in these last two weeks to prove to conservatives that we understand their grievances."

* "The reality of how affects media coverage is outrageous."

* "he Mary Mapes' of the world are ruining it for the rest of us, and they are the dominant majority."

* "Most of my colleagues, as you know, are in denial about , or blind to it."

* "The old system was biased against conservatives; there's no doubt about it." "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Politico criticizing media bias is about as logical as FAUX Noise doing the same
Politic-Ho is to Team Clinton/DLC what FAUX is to Chimp/PNAC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm so tired of these kind of clowns. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cameozalaznick Donating Member (624 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. I guess he was sound asleep during that month
that Reverend Wright was on a continuous loop. And he must have been out of town during that entire WEEK of the lipstick/pig controversy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. mark halperin spends his
life 1/2 asleep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. What a bunch of hogwash. I'm thinking Halperin can't get the taste
Edited on Sat Nov-22-08 06:31 PM by babylonsister
of sour grapes out of his mouth. Just maybe, if McSame's campaign hadn't been so revolting, he'd have gotten better press.

http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3612
The Myth of Pro-Obama Media Bias
Little evidence for self-proclaimed ‘lovefest’

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/no-pro-obama-media-bias-says/story.aspx?guid={05F36C9C-40CB-49B3-A679-3432CA660E26}
Jim Lehrer sees no pro-Obama media bias
Commentary: 'There's an ebb and flow to the news'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. mark halperin is a lying piece of shit..
and he knows it.

Fucker must be apoleptic about not getting his tax cuts.

Tough that mccain and palin had so much negatives to offer and the corporatemedia couldn't cover it up this time.

mark halperin gets the stinky cheeze award to go with his whine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VADem11 Donating Member (783 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. The media bias charge
just never dies for the rightwingers does it? It seems like the Washington Post is obsessed with avoiding any hints of Obama bias as well. Thankfully, these people are becoming more and more irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. Mark Halperin carries water for the GOP
Earlier this year he said McCain should...."Emphasize Barack Hussein Obama's unusual name and exotic background through a Manchurian Candidate prism."

http://thepage.time.com/halperin%E2%80%99s-take-ways-mccain-can-beat-obama-that-clinton-cannot/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. mark halperin lost and the Planet
won. HaHa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. How tough has Halperin covered the Iraq war and the lead up to it?
Fucking Hyprocrite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. Marcia, Marcia, Marcia!


What a whiny shallow article. I love this part:

"The example that I use, at the end of the campaign, was the two profiles that The New York Times ran of the potential first ladies," Halperin said. "The story about Cindy McCain was vicious. It looked for every negative thing they could find about her and it case her in an extraordinarily negative light. It didn't talk about her work, for instance, as a mother for her children, and they cherry-picked every negative thing that's ever been written about her."

The story about Michelle Obama, by contrast, was "like a front-page endorsement of what a great person Michelle Obama is," according to Halperin.

Sorry if the truth hurts, fuckstick.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. so, there were articles written about Michelle's fucking college thesis, Halperin.
Excuse Michelle for not being a drug thief...geeze.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
16. Um. If McCain had anything GOOD to report on, they would have reported on it.
Duh. It's not Obama's fault that McCain ran the worst campaign in the history of American elections. I guess I was asleep in journalism class the day they explained that you HAVE to report everything in equally glowing terms when writing about two campaigns -- even if one campaign is a totally worthless piece of shit campaign.

This faux equivalency must be a new invention in journalism. If something blows.. the damnit the media needs to report on how badly it blows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
17. Mark Halperin has a history of being on crack.
Edited on Sat Nov-22-08 06:34 PM by ErinBerin84
He consistently rated McCain as having an "amazing, winning " week, after an especially horrific, embarrassing week for McCain. And he said that Sarah Palin in the VP debate was the third coming of Reagan and Bill Clinton...he's just trying to get attention, like Zogby. He said that McCain won the week that the economy crashed! And he said that McCain won the week where he had a gaffe per day, like the birth control/viagra google eyes, among others.

"


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/18/mark-halperin-somehow-con_n_127512.html (Jason Linkins)

"Okay. I was alive this past week, and I couldn't help but notice that the following things occurred:

The economy collapsed, putting McCain's party at a distinct disadvantage.
McCain, nevertheless, said the "fundamentals of our economy are strong."
Then he said they weren't.
Then he said that by "economic fundamentals" he meant "workers," a definition no one else in the world uses.
McCain's response initially was a big government approach to fighting greed.
Followed by a small government approach to fighting regulation.
Prominent conservatives like David Brooks, Chuck Hagel and Charles Krauthammer, threw a big wet blanket on McCain for his choice to put Sarah Palin on the ticket.
As did incoherent McCain enthusiast Richard Cohen.
Karl Rove warned that the Palin frenzy was going to cool down.
Which is wise, because it is.
Meanwhile, McCain's surrogates are getting worked like speedbags all over the media.
Including a chorus of the piss and moan blues after the rough treatment the McCains received on that perennially hard-hitting news show, The View.
One prominent surrogate said that Tina Fey, of all people, was "sexist."
The same surrogate said that John McCain and Sarah Palin didn't have the acumen to run a company.
Those remarks forced the McCain campaign to "disappear" her.
Not so for the idiot who went in front of reporters to claim that John McCain invented the BlackBerry.
And then John McCain decided, "Heck, why not ramp up some pointless diplomatic conflict with Spain?"
After that sort of week, one might expect that the negative poll trends that bedeviled Obama in the run out from the Republican National Convention would begin to reverse themselves. And, you know what? They have.

BUT FORGET ALL THAT. Because Mark Halperin, over at his Kooky Komic Book Of Politics, sees it differently: "Obama Closes Strong, But McCain Wins The Week." Which raises one question. Why is Mark Halperin TOTALLY BOGARTING THE PINEAPPLE EXPRESS HE'S SMOKING? "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
18. pffffft
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lxlxlxl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
21. The media is center/right...the more they protest about liberals i know its just a mask.
after these last eight years, its obvious to me that the media
is a bunch of undergrads incapable of seeing how their careerist
material comfort is a justification for the worst type of conservatism--
the conservatism that doesnt need anything other than distraction
to succeed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
22. Maybe if their campaign wasn't all lies, smears and gimmicks they would have got better coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
23. As always, The Onion nailed it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dennis4868 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
24. "Media bias was more intense in the 2008 election than in any other national campaign "
ummmmm where was this guy in 2000 when Al Gore was killed by the media day after day for things he did not do or say and all the while Bush got a free pass on EVERYTHING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I'm going to take a wild guess and say he was helping perpetrate the same thing
he now claims happened in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #24
54. It was there in 2004 also n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
25. whore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
27. Did he miss the non-stop coverage of Rev. Wright? Not to mention how the media totally
gave McCain passes on his not knowing the difference between Shia and Sunni, on lying to a fellow veteran about his own voting record re: vets' rights, on his getting a "D" for his voting record for vets., etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
28. "Reality has a well-known liberal bias."
"Mark Halperin...A Disgusting Failure"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
29. YEah, because going on an on about Wright, Ayers, Michelle's gaffe etc.
Edited on Sat Nov-22-08 07:15 PM by IWantAnyDem
showed so much pro-Obama bias.

:eyes:

Halperin, you goddamned rightwingnut hack, fuck you very much. You're just pissed off because nobody would touch the really crazy bullshit about the birth certificate and LArry Sinclair with a ten foot pole and you didn't have the nerve to put your career on the line talking about that phony assed bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
30. Obviously, Halperin is pissed McCain-Palin lost. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
31. Oh Right
This is the guy who put a picture of Obama as a dirty rat out up on Time.com, which was so egregious it had to be taken down. Why they didn't fire him on the spot is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
32. This is BULLSHIT
Based on the fact that the media promoted two divergent views of two different candidates ...

Well NO SHIT SHERLOCK ! ...

Two candidates would provide TWO separate worldviews as they campaign, and ONE candidate promoted a POSITIVE worldview based on inclusion ... while the other provides a SLASH AND BURN campaign message that tore down America, trying to impugn half the population as 'not america', and to marginalize the citizenry to an ugly narrow minded hateful view ....

When Obama was covered: It promoted HIS positive view ...

When McCain/Palin was covered : It promoted THEIR ugly negative view ....

That is EXACTLY what we would expect from such divergent viewpoints ....

What does Mark want ? .... the media to COMPOSE a positive campaign message from McCain even if he was unwilling to do so ?

I would challenge Mr. Halperin to provide a SINGLE POSITIVE MESSAGE expressed by the McCain camp .... name ONE ....

Country First ? ... My ASS !

FUCK you Mark .... Goddamned liar ....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Progressive Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
33. Ayers ayers ayers wright wright wright terrorist muslim huseein BOOGA BOOGA BOOGA!
What kind of idiot is Mark Halperin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. Socialist, socialist, socialist, Rezco, Rezco, Rezco, Communist, Communist, Communist.....
Bradley Effect, Hard working Whites, Bradley Effect, Hard Working Whites, Bradley Effect, Hard working Whites, Bradley Effect, Hard Working Whites, Bradley Effect, Hard working Whites, Bradley Effect, Hard Working Whites, Bradley Effect, Hard working Whites, Bradley Effect, Hard Working Whites, Bradley Effect, Hard working Whites, Bradley Effect, Hard Working Whites, Bradley Effect, Hard working Whites, Bradley Effect, Hard Working Whites,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Progressive Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. I think you forgot to mention the Bradley Effect!
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Realityhack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
34. When you are loosing the game... game the refs. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. They need an explanation for their loss that absolves them from any blame
The idea that people ain't buying what they're selling is just too painful to contemplate. Why wouldn't Mr. and Mrs. Real America vote for another four years of having their life savings plundered in order to pay for endless wars and "golden parachutes" for corporate fatcats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Realityhack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. Yep that's part of it.
At a higher level though they also will admit something is fair and label it as biased any way to try to game the 'ref' (typically the media).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calmblueocean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
36. Stupid and shortsighted. McCain brought most of his neg. press upon himself by making bad choices!
I've heard a lot of conservatives blaming the media for their loss this time around.

None of them seem to be able to admit that McCain's bad choices forced a lot of the negative reporting he got. When he "suspended" his campaign, canceled the upcoming debate, flew to Washington -- where the bill he supposedly flew to support failed to pass -- and then "uncanceled" the debate without any resolution on the matter he'd suspended his campaign for... how can you NOT expect negative press?

When you pick a woman who hasn't even spent a full term as governor as your VP, and you hide her away from all interviews, refuse to let her give any press conferences, and then when she finally gives an interview, she repeatedly utters comments that reveal her ignorance... how can you NOT expect negative press?

Obama got plenty of negative press of his own. Remember how Obama "couldn't close the deal"? Does the phrase "hardworking whites" ring a bell? How about the words "bitter" and "cling"? And who could forget, "No no no, not 'God bless America! God DAMN America!" we heard it every 10 minutes for about a month.

But Obama was and is a genuine phenomenon, and the press had to cover it, because it was genuine news. People like Halperin would have journalists ignore what's really happening in favor of reporting a false neutrality where each side is made out to have equal amounts of excitement, and run equally good campaigns, even when one side is surging and the other is stumbling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
37. Halperin, there's nobody to blame for that but McCain
McCain ran a 100% negative campaign, and his coverage reflected that. McCain's campaign was all over the place with the kitchen sink strategy, flummoxed just like the Hillary Clinton people were in the primaries. Obama's was positive and of hope, so his media narrative generally went along those lines. (Except for those times like when he was forced by them to quit his church, or ABC News reminding us that Osama bin Laden should release a video the weekend before the election to stay relevant.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #37
63. EXACTLY .....
Im glad to hear more of this .....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
43. McCain/Palin deserved the negative stories...
and more. The MSM media desperately misreported and misrepresented the facts to keep McCain in the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndrewP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
44. If you are evil war mongering assholes, you should get bad press
Of course, the truth is that much of the media kissed McCains ass because of his "Straight Talk" false reputation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malik flavors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
45. Mark Halperin is an EXCELLENT journalist. Truly one of the finest political voices we have.
Oh no!!! He said something we didn't like!! Boo-hoo, get over it.

He's absolutely objective in his coverage. If he thinks the media was biased during this election, that's his opinion, but it doesn't make hime a right-wing shill. Jeez, some people around here are so freaking ridiculous.

He's also the guy that said the media needed to do it's job and keep digging into Palin's past and report whatever was there to be reported, regardless of the cries from conservatives. I didn't hear anybody around here complaining when he said that during prime time on national television.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. Mark Halperin, the great journalist?
You're entitled to your own opinion (and I guess Mark is entitled to his....), but I still think that Mark has a history of misrepresenting the facts, and I have thought so for a while....it has nothing to do with this one thing he has said, I just think he's a hypocrite. He has also said some gushing things about Palin that I question, so whatever...he's entitled to his own opinion, but I just find it funny that him of all people gets santimonious about the media coverage. He tries to make The Page into the new Drudge Report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malik flavors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. The only similarity between the two is that they're both frequently updated.
You can't tell me that "The Page" has a republican lean, because it doesn't. It's straight down the middle with plenty of pro-Obama stories and some not-so-great Obama stories. The way honest journalism should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. touche...I guess just in terms of, he wants to make himself seem really relevent
I still think that Mark Halperin is a whore who has a history of distorting the truth, but I guess our opinions differ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #45
55. Please, Halperin is a right wing shill and always has been
He's been pulling this same BS since his days at The Note. Just go to Media Matters and The Daily Howler and do a search. They has many examples of Halperin's blantant bias.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #45
56. For the last 3 years, he's been claiming media bias against Republicans
This is not just something he's said once. His interview with Hugh Hewitt was appalling

http://glenngreenwald.blogspot.com/2006/10/mark-halperin-and-hugh-hewitt-all-you.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #45
57. either way; he's grossly wrong here
if he wants to call out the campaign media for having a cozier relationship with Obama than McCain, then more power to him...But for him to say Obama got the same kid-glove treatment that the run-up to the Iraq invasion did is irresponsible hyperbole
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #45
64. digby proves otherwise:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
47. So what if it was. The goddamn Republicans have been
screaming about the liberal media for years. If we are going to take shit for it we could at least have one. On top of that Obama was NEWS. Read my lips McCain=Old and Boring Obama=Young and Exciting, and that's also why Palin got so much goddamn coverage, because whatever she was to either side it wasn't boring.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
50. I didn't know Halperin was a PUMA.
;rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
51. Halperin is full of shit.
And anyone paying attention knows it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
52. hmm, the couple of times i saw him on Charlie Rose he sounded in love with Obama.
whatever dude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-08 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
53. Republican Mark says media biased for Obama. Gee.
Edited on Sat Nov-22-08 11:15 PM by LynnTheDem
Really.

:eyes:

Markie's pet peeve "liberal bias" in 2006;

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/09/03/halperin/

"Liberal bias" my fucking arse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
58. Ferchissakes, George Will was masturbating every time he talked about Reverend Wright
Ayers... Wright... he can't make the sale... the Bradley effect? Ayers, Wright, can't get the woman vote... he's an elitist...

IT WAS MONTHS AND MONTHS OF THAT SHIT!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JaneQPublic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
59. When one campaign is nearly flawless and the other is deeply flawed...
...the media are not biased when they accurately report that reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
60. Reality has a well-known liberal bias
I wonder what great American thinker could have said that...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
61. Now he notices the bias????????????
Where the hell was he doing the primaries when Tweety and many others in the media had a collective case of tingling legs? Funny how so many journalists are now claiming mea culpa and a bias, well they go what they wanted. Why complain about it now?

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #61
67. Is It Bias Not To Give Equal Time To Global Warming Deniers?
Mark Halperin is once again pushing the logical fallacy of false neutrality. All ideas do not have equal weight. For example, McCain's promise to balance the budget in four years is not equal to Obama's recognition that the budget will not be balanced in 1 term. Halperin complains about media bias, but what does he mean by that?

It seems that he is referring to an equal proportion of negative and positive stories, but according to this logic, whenever a story on global warming is published, there should also be equal time to a global warming denier.

Media bias is red herring. The real question is accuracy and fairness. Rush Limbaugh does not equal Rachel Maddow, because while both are biased, Rush tends to push false facts to fit his idealogy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-08 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
62. I'd say Halperin is part of the problem.
I looked at his site a few times. I don't remember it being particularly critical of Obama. I've also seen him on CNN. Why didn't he bring this up during the election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samsingh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
65. we should get the facts out before the imbeciles in the media
decide to turn far, far right (they are already far right) in response to these sorts of lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
66. He never noticed the months of 24/7 coverage the media gave the Swiftliars
Interrupted every now and then by TERROR ALERTS? And did he forget that corpmedia REFUSED to broadcast Kerry's counters to the lies or allow airtime to those who would assault the lies of the swifts?

Halperin forgets the media TURNED on Dan Rather and made sure he was pushed out of the business because he dared expose the truth about AWOL Bush they all must have pledged to keep hidden?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
69. HA! And in 2000 there was not pro Shrub bias? what comes around goes around Markie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
70. Mark Halperin is a disgusting piece of afterbirth.
Oh yeah, and a failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenLeft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
71. this, after declaring Obama's 30-minute infomercial...
"fucking brilliant?"

If a candidate is an excellent candidate, is intuitive, efficient, inspiring, and takes the high-road, it's "bias?" What if it's true... and everybody says so?

Asshole.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
72. Halperin must have blinders on to not see how badly McCain mangled his campaign.
Of course, the media would treat Obama better. He was running an effective campaign, and McCain was stumbling all over the place!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brindis_desala Donating Member (866 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
73. Once again liberals are chastised for being coherent. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC