Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Blue Dogs face uncertainty

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 02:46 PM
Original message
Blue Dogs face uncertainty

WASHINGTON - To appreciate how much the economic crisis is scrambling the political battle lines on Capitol Hill, consider the plight of the Blue Dog Democrats.

The influential coalition of fiscally conservative House Democrats saw their ranks swell on Election Day, and they stand to gain even greater clout with a White House alliance they spent months cultivating. Just days after his victory, President-elect Barack Obama reportedly assigned economic adviser Jason Furman to consult regularly with the Blue Dogs on economic issues. Speaker Nancy Pelosi acknowledged the centrists' new power when she said, a few days after her party gained 20-plus House seats, "The country must be governed from the middle."

----

MORE: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27804220/

Good to see that PE Obama is not only reaching across the aisle to Republicans....but also to the RWoDP (Republican Wing of the Democratic Party).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IndianaJones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. its got you members of the WWoDP all bent out of shape, huh? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Are you being sarcastic about Obama reaching out?
If you are, that's pretty dumb. There are not enough progressives in the House for a majority...he's going to need some blue dog support if he wants to get anything done. And not all blue dogs are bad...most of them still vote the right way on most issues, and many of them are from districts that simply would not elect progressives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. But thinking like that
is realistic and doesn't allow people to think that they can have an "ideologically pure" party just the way they want it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC