Unsane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-24-08 09:51 PM
Original message |
Will Obama sign the Employee Free Choice Act into law, or will his overlord Larry Summers say no? |
|
:sarcasm:
But really, does anyone see EFCA passing in the next four years now that the economy is so screwed? I doubt neoliberals like Geithner and Summers support the bill, and the rightwing will portray any pro-labor legislation as 'bad for the economy.' I hope Obama takes some initiative with this thing, and begins to understand just exactly who voted for him in places like Pennsylvania and Ohio.
|
midnight
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-24-08 09:53 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I would say it is even more reason to sign this into law.... |
democrattotheend
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-24-08 09:53 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I think he will sign it if it lands on his desk, but the question is how hard he will fight for it. The unions have a pretty strong program in place to hold members of Congress accountable, but it sure would help to have a president who helped keep senators in line, especially the ones from Arkansas. The question is how hard Obama will push for it. I have no doubt that he will sign it if it's on his desk but I hope he expends some political capital to help get it there.
|
Mojambo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-24-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. Agreed. The real battle is getting it to his desk. |
|
There's a bunch of Blue Dog democrats that are going to be real dicks about this.
I do grow uneasy at Obama essentially buying into some conservative economic dogma wrt delaying the repeal of the Bush tax cut. And Summers influence is certainly not good.
All in all, I do not like the chances for EFCA at all.
But I'm a pessimist.
|
redstate_democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-24-08 09:54 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I don't think Obama is crazy |
|
He can't be for a bill before he was against it. He's a co-sponsor and promised a shit load of union leaders he would sign in. If he doesn't the unions will go batshit and that's pretty much it after that.
|
Unsane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-24-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
Thrill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-24-08 10:04 PM
Response to Original message |
6. He's got to sign that. Not so much because of his union support |
|
But because he obviously believes strongly in it himself
|
NewJeffCT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-24-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message |
7. The fact that he hasn't made it law yet means his presidency is already a failure |
|
I mean, why wait till inauguration, he should start now, dammit, now!
|
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-24-08 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. Let's burn him at the stake! |
|
Did you also know that 9/11 was all Clinton's fault? Some folks evidently don't know this......
|
AndyTiedye
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-24-08 11:43 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Repigs Will Filibuster |
BzaDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-25-08 12:55 AM
Response to Original message |
10. I highly doubt it would get past the Senate as proposed now. |
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-25-08 12:57 AM
Response to Original message |
11. Obama's overlord or his overseer or perhaps his master hey? |
Uzybone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-25-08 12:58 AM
Response to Original message |
|
if it reaches his desk. Its not on his top 5 list right now though, so Congress will have to buck up.
|
Jennicut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-25-08 12:58 AM
Response to Original message |
13. neoliberals? I had no idea there was such a group. I am just getting over the neocons |
scheming daemons
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-25-08 01:03 AM
Response to Original message |
14. I agree with George McGovern... the EFCA is undemocratic and unamerican |
|
Unions are great.... but people should be allowed to vote anonymously as to whether they want to join a union or not.
This is coersion. It is wrong. No matter if the "ends" are good. The ends don't justify the means.
...and this is not a "conservative" position.... George McGovern agrees with me.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:26 PM
Response to Original message |