Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who will be TIME Magazine's Person of the Year?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 12:32 AM
Original message
Poll question: Who will be TIME Magazine's Person of the Year?
Hmmmm...

2000--George W. Bush
1992--Bill Clinton
1988--"The Endangered Earth"
1980--Ronald Reagan
1976--Jimmy Carter
1968--The Apollo 8 Astronauts
1964--Lyndon Johnson
1960--"US Scientists"
1952--Elizabeth II
1948--Harry S Truman
1932--Franklin D. Roosevelt
1928--Walter Chrysler

As a non-incumbent President, Obama has a 58% chance of making it on the cover.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sarah Palin!
joking! god no. It'll be Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACK!!!
What if they do a big ol' switcheroo and it IS her!

Do you put it past them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larry in KC Donating Member (465 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yes, I have to say, I do. I put it past them. Thank goodness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
18. if they do that, I will rip up every Time I see, even if it gets me
arrested!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'll post a youtube video of me jumping through rings of fire if it's not Obama
I mean....come on. How can it not be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 05:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. I'll post a youtube video of me setting Time magazines on fire if it's Palin
And yes, I mean right in the racks.

Don't worry.... I'll make sure the fire doesn't spread..... except to maybe some other right wing magazines. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. I don't care about Time Magazine. I just don't. Mark Haleperin helped me with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. It had BETTER be Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. The last four election-year covers have been the winner of the White House.
I don't think that's about to change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Actually, in 1996, it was someone other than Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. You're right; it was that AIDS researcher.
That was not one of their best picks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. It could be GWB for failure. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobTheSubgenius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
11. Gotta be Obama. No one else even close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camera obscura Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
12. I wouldn't be surprised if it's Sarah Palin, after their shenanigans (like picking "You") recently
They seem to have forgotten about the historical aspect in favor of selling copies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
14. I stopped giving a fuck about this award
as soon as they said "YOU" are the person of the year. I've never seen a worse journalistic cop-out, not even in the Washington Times.

They could name Palin the person of the year and I wouldn't give a shit. I stopped reading the magazine right when they set the cop-out cold standard.

In answer to the OP, it SHOULD be Obama, but watch the magazine pick Axl Rose or some shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
15. I hope they figure it out
and make it the US voter. It would be appropriate and everyone would go "yeah, that's right!"

Put a photo of a cross section of voters on the cover.


but who am I

It could also be some dumb ass move like Palin, or more likely in the dumb ass move category, Joe the Plumber
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bad Thoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
16. "The Voter" or "The Unappreciated Taxpayer)
Time is getting good at cheesing out, and they will pick a collective "man of the year" that reflects either the election or the bailout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Youphemism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
17. There's an argument that it would be Bush...

TIME always reminds people that the Person of the Year is the person who had the most impact -- positive or negative -- on the world.

While I still think that's Obama, causing a world economic collapse is a pretty close second place. The destruction caused by Bush is the only thing that even approaches the impact of the history-making ascendance of Obama, in a polar opposite kinda way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC