Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Robert Gates: Should We Want Him to Stay? by Steve Clemons

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 03:40 AM
Original message
Robert Gates: Should We Want Him to Stay? by Steve Clemons
Edited on Wed Nov-26-08 03:41 AM by Douglas Carpenter

Robert Gates: Should We Want Him to Stay?

by Steve Clemons
http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/2008/11/robert_gates_sh/

Bob Gates is keeping his Pentagon perch (which has been quite clear for some time).

I had moved close to the view that Gates should go. My thinking at the time was that Gates played a vital role "Out-Cheneying Cheney" in the last couple of years of G.W. Bush's term, but that his skill at crunching out the ambiguity in the national security decision making process that Cheney and Rumsfeld exploited would not be necessary in the Obama White House ecosystem.

In other words, one needed Gates to be a constraint on Bush, but why would Obama want to run the risk that Gates would constrain his team?

After speaking to some other national security policy experts very close to Bob Gates and General Brent Scowcroft, I changed course and began to see the value of Gates staying at DoD.

My hunch is that Gates wants a chance to make the kind of leaps in the Middle East I have been writing about for some time. He wants to try and push Iran-US relations into a constructive direction. He wants to change the game in Afghanistan -- and the answer will not be a military-dominant strategy. He wants to try and stabilize Iraq in a negotiated, confidence building process that includes Saudi Arabia, Iran, Turkey and other regional forces. And he wants to support a big push on Israel-Palestine peace and reconfigure relations between much of the Arab League and Israel.

This is a big order. And he wants to lurk in the shadows, behind the scenes and away from cameras and let other of Obama's team get the spotlight and credit.

National Security Advisor-to-be Jim Jones is on the same page as Gates -- and the two of them will constitute a considerably strong axis of power inside the Obama White House. My hunch is that Hillary Clinton and her State Department Deputy James Steinberg will work collaboratively to achieve this vision.

It's a big gamble. There is a large chance of paralysis between big foreign policy/national security guns that don't like yielding to power rivals in an administration.

But the gamble could be a very big payoff for Obama and the country -- and would actually deliver the "change" that so many are expecting.

We'll see -- not trying to be naive or to give Obama too many breaks. But I am trying to understand his choices and how he thinks he's going to achieve his policy targets.

-- Steve Clemons

http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/2008/11/robert_gates_sh/

.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FKA MNChimpH8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Gates is not Rumsfeld. He's no saint, but he's no idiot either
and the continuity is not necessarily a bad thing til Wes Clark becomes able to hold the position after 10 full years of retirement from active service. Gates ain't gonna piss on Obama's parade. He's a bureaucrat, not a PNAC ideologue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. my thoughts exactly! Gates appears to be a pragmatic technocrat - not an ideologue
And he could perhaps help provide the necessary political cover for a a more pragmatic Middle East policy rooted more in enlightened self-interest rather than ideology and reflexive, "war on terror" emotionalism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. /
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think the most important thing right now is continuity, and Gates gives
you that. It seems like a lot of prople are forgeting that it's the Commander In Cheif who sets the direction and it's the Gates' of the Gov't that implement those directives. Gates is a smart man and knows what he's doing, and he's NOT an idiot idalog like Rummy. This is a good move to keep him on for a smooth transition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. I actually think he should stay, at least for a little while
He is a registered independant and He may well turn out to be a huge asset under an Obama administration. Remember that Obama is not Bush- they could end up being a great team with Obama as head coach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. I was actually somewhat impressed with Gates. I have a feeling he kept us out of Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. Hmmmmm I think Gates wants to write a book. And being in this historic administration
Is a great closing chapter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. Obama wants him. So there is that
Of course my pick would be someone like the Kooch, but then I'm a damned commie peacnik.

As it is Gates makes a great target for us. Who in the greater world would object to citizens of the US complaining mightily about our defense department?

Iirc, If i remember correctly the dod budget is the most wasteful large item on the federal budget. Lets take it down a notch or two, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. It all depends on what you define as waste, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. one kick for the next shift
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC