Blue_Roses
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-26-08 11:57 AM
Original message |
I saw a "Palin 2012" bumper sticker and found myself |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-26-08 11:57 AM by Blue_Roses
wanting to yell profanities out the window. I was hoping that after the election we wouldn't have to be burdened with her crap any more, but after "turkey-gate" last week, I see she is trying anything to stay in the headlines:eyes:
There was a time, when I didn't think there was anyone I could detest more than Bush, but now I think there is. :argh:
|
ayeshahaqqiqa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-26-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Only good thing about it |
|
is that it gives Trudeau ideas for "Doonesbury".
|
liberal N proud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-26-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message |
2. The people who still have bu$h stickers replacing them with the new idiot |
onehandle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-26-08 12:02 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Palin 2012 = 40+ Blue States. nt |
nichomachus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-26-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
The next four years are going to be tough. We may still continue sinking into an economic abyss for a couple more years -- no matter what Obama does.
The corporate media -- also knows as the Reality Creation Machine -- can poison the well and pave the way for a "fresh face." At the same time, the neocons can polish the Palin turd a lot and the corporate media could make her seem like a reasonable alternative to what they will try to paint as Obama's "failed presidency."
I'm not saying that will happen -- or should happen -- just that they have the power to do it.
Remember, 58 million people voted for her in November, given her dismal performance and her running mate.
So, I wouldn't be writing Sarah Palin off as a joke just yet. I'd keep a very wary eye on her.
|
T Wolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-26-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. A warning all would be smart to heed. Even with the amazing weakness of the puke |
|
ticket and the war and the economic crash and everything else, the election was almost close enough for them to steal. Too many are high on the victory and unwilling or unable to see the very difficult battles that lie ahead that will be necessary to hold on to the win.
|
rvablue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-26-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. Nichomachus..you are so right...we ignore Palin at our own peril. n/t |
Muttocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-26-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. Bush took office twice - anything is possible! nt |
wryter2000
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-26-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-26-08 01:03 PM by wryter2000
I'm hoping the run her, you betcha!
I doubt they'd give her the nomination, though. It would be fun to watch the Republican machine grinding her to dust.
|
customerserviceguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-26-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
12. Yep, celebrate Caribou Barbie |
|
she sucks the oxygen out of the room for the really serious Repuke candidates!
|
Vanje
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-26-08 12:27 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I'd find myself yelling, "Thank you Baby Jeeezus!!"
Sarah Palin is a nit-wit now. She'll be a nit-wit in 4 years, with an even bigger record of nit-wittery.
|
happychatter
(619 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-26-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message |
9. probably trying to hide her W04 sticker |
|
I hope they ALL get a Palin sticker
|
leftynyc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-26-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message |
10. I would have laughed maniacally |
|
I truly hope the pubs are delusional enough to think she'd make a good candidate. Who would be her VP? Which of the dinosaurs would happily play second banana to a *gasp* woman?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:05 AM
Response to Original message |