I know it's not fashionable to post links anymore but...

[Lilith Velkor]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27832013

Now, why do you suppose NBC would say the leaks were coming from Obama's people if the real source were Clinton's people? Hmmmmm.

[stillcool]

1. Why does NBC say anything?

the rumor mill is full of aides close to the transition team, Democrats close to the negotiations, etc., I should really go dig up some links prior to the VP pick about who was saying what, but why bother? We'll know soon enough, right?

[Lilith Velkor]

2. Sure we will.

What I am interested in is links to sources disputing what NBC said.

I don't suppose there are any, except maybe for that McCainiac blog post that has spawned a brazillion threads.

[stillcool]

3. There really is nothing to dispute...

is there? It's the same thing that's been going around for weeks now. Speculation. The media can't help themselves. It's all they do..speculate, obfuscate, and out and out lie. I can't wait until we go back to scrutinizing news stories. This election thing has thrown the media credibility game all out of whack. Any source is a good source as long as it says what you want. I think we all do it, because it's all we've got.

[Lilith Velkor]

4. Well, I don't.

The truth still matters.