ccharles000
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 09:00 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Best senate seat to pick up in 2010? |
|
I think Burr will go down in NC he is so weak and if we could beat Dole Burr won't be hard. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_elections,_2010
|
AllentownJake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 09:04 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I think Specter is going down in the Primary thanks to alot of the moderate GOPers becoming Dems.
A conservative GOPer vs. a Democrat always results in the democrat winning in PA. Santorum ran as a moderate his first two times. his crazy didn't come out till re-election
|
valerief
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. I think man-on-dog sex will make a comeback in 2010, and Santorum has cornered that fear. nt |
AllentownJake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. or sleeping with dead babies and taking it home for your children to hold |
valerief
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Ick! Forgot about that one. Yecch! nt |
Radical Activist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 09:52 PM
Original message |
|
fucked up. I hope he runs in the primary though so I can revive using the word Santorum as it was meant to be used.
|
Historic NY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 11:47 PM
Response to Original message |
31. that could be messy.. |
Radical Activist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-29-08 04:13 AM
Response to Reply #31 |
camera obscura
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 09:06 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I think we could take Florida provided we get a good, mass-appeal candidate |
|
Wasserman Schultz maybe? (I love Wexler but I fear he's too polarizing for an entire state.)
I also think we could take Kansas if Sebelius decides to run.
|
Ediacara
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. I like Wasserman-Schultz (although not being in FL, I don't know how mass-appeal she is) |
|
I have a feeling that her constant TV presence in 2008 was a precursor to her running for Senate.
|
David Zephyr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
14. I also like her a lot. I hope the Party will rally behind her for Senate. |
FLAprogressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
21. I don't like her at all. She's a DINO traitor. |
|
She was more interested in keeping the 3 Cuban reactionaries in office than helping Dems. She also told the candidate who was running against Adam Putnam to not "pull that populist stuff" on her.
|
elleng
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-29-08 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
32. Right; I have problems with her too |
|
(ffrom here in maryland!)
She's sure been sticking her neck out, to make lots of noise; but maybe to gain creds in house? Thats ok with me.
|
FLAprogressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-29-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
37. Dissing your own party's candidates is gaining creds? nt |
Ediacara
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 09:28 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I think we'll take Florida and maybe NC and MO |
|
Edited on Fri Nov-28-08 09:29 PM by DinoBoy
Florida will be sweetest just because it'll get Mel Martinez off of my TV with his self righteous jerkitude.
|
TheDebbieDee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 09:36 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Missouri. Hey, hey! Ho, ho! Kit Bond's gotta go! |
|
Then, in 2012, we can work on replacing Sen. Claire McCaskill with a REAL Democrat!
|
Hippo_Tron
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. What do you have against Claire McCaskill? |
|
She's one of my favorite Senators.
|
TheDebbieDee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
27. My problem with Claire McCaskill is that she votes like Feinstein |
|
Edited on Fri Nov-28-08 11:18 PM by TheDebbieDee
and Landrieu. She may talk a good bi-partisan game but she votes like the no-"Talent" repuke she replaced.
But, first things first. We gotta get rid of Bond!
|
ccharles000
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
12. I always thought Claire was nice. |
TheDebbieDee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
28. She is nice, but she votes with the repukes......... |
phillysuse
(683 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 09:43 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Pennsylvania - Spector won't run and Pat Toomey |
|
and or Santorum will fight for the Club For Growth vote. On the dem side you will have Chris Matthews and likely others including maybe Joe Sestak, Patrick Murphy and Alison Schwartz. Maybe even Rendell will throw himself into the fight.
|
David Zephyr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
15. I agree. I think PA is our best shot. |
|
And I don't care what anyone says, it should be Chris Mathews.
|
AllentownJake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
30. Joe Sestak is actually a better candidate for PA |
|
Military credentials that play well outside of Philly (He gets the Philly burb votes based on being a rep from there) and he votes almost 100% with democrats in congress. Matthews is an unknown commodity.
|
AllentownJake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
29. God I hope Rendell retires |
Radical Activist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 09:43 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Any chance Grassley will retire? |
|
If he does it should be an easy pick up. Just run Culver or Vilsack.
|
Capt. America
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 09:47 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Duh, Ohio! Voinovich is 104 years old. He will likely not run again [hopes]. |
Radical Activist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 10:00 PM
Response to Original message |
16. The great thing is that there are so many potential pick ups. |
|
Edited on Fri Nov-28-08 10:05 PM by Radical Activist
PA. NC. Kansas. Coburn in OK. Voinovich has low approval numbers in Ohio, which has been more Democratic lately. Vitter had a scandal in Louisiana and only got 51% his first term. Bunning barely won last time in KY. We can hope for a couple retirements. It looks to me like we're getting our 60 votes in 2010 if we don't get them now.
|
me b zola
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 10:03 PM
Response to Original message |
17. FL: Bill Nelson's seat is ripe for a Democrat to take it |
Blue_In_AK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 10:11 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Lisa Murkowski is coming up for re-election in 2010. |
|
I'll be surprised if Sarah doesn't try to take her on in the primary, in which case I hope Lisa kicks her ass. At least Sen. M has a brain and isn't consumed with seeking the limelight. I've heard some rumors about possible Democratic contenders, but nothing definite yet.
|
MasonJar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Best in what way? If one means easiest, then Kentucky if Bunning runs again. |
Danger Mouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message |
20. Are any DEM seats in jeopardy for 2010? |
ccharles000
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
Danger Mouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
24. Put up a strong Dem primary challenger so he doesn't end up being deadweight. |
ShadowLiberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
26. But a primary challenge would just make things worse for us over there |
|
Primary challenges tend to weaken the party engaged in them, especially if the other party doesn't have a primary challenge.
Take a look at New Mexico for a perfect example. Early on the polling showed it would be a very competitive race between Democrat Udall and either one of the republicans running for the party's nomination. By primary day however both republicans were polling very badly against Udall, over 15% behind him.
|
FLAprogressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
camera obscura
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-29-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
39. Doubt it. Brian Krolicki is in trouble & he was their designated candidate for 2010. |
ShadowLiberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-28-08 10:59 PM
Response to Original message |
25. How could you not list PA or NH? Both could be in BIG trouble if the right people run |
|
Specter only narrowly survived a tough primary battle against Tooney last time, and may very well have it because of an endorsement from Bush. A lot of PA insiders believe that Tooney is going to challenge Specter again if he seeks reelection.
Then there's New Hampshire, while it's certainly no slam dunk I think Electoral Vote laid out a nice case on why Senator Gregg ought to be VERY nervous right now. Since getting reelected in 2004 (with over 60% of the vote though I'll admit, which shows he'll be tougher then Sununu to unseat) his state has gone very blue. In 2006 both the republicans controlled house seats flipped to the democrats, I believe the democrats also took control of the state legislature for the first time in decades. In 2008 the other sitting senator, a republican, lost. And the democrats have control of the governorship to, John Lynch a democrat, won the governorship recently by the largest margin ever in New Hampshire history, with 77% of the vote.
Worst yet for Senator Gregg, New Hampshire governors are elected to two year terms, so what if the extremely popular governor Lynch decides to run for the senate? Senator Gregg would likely be very screwed then, I mean how can you possibly beat a guy who recently won a statewide election by the largest margin ever in state history?
As for the most likely pickup for us though, while I wouldn't have said it until looking at that page, those early polls in Florida are quite promising. If an incumbent can't even crack the 40% mark then they're in big trouble. Incumbents scoring under 50% are considered vulnerable, and he's scoring at least 13% below 50% in all the polls so far. Worse yet for him, that one democrat they matched him up against scored 51% of the vote! We've got to get him to run for us there.
|
elleng
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-29-08 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #25 |
davidpdx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-29-08 01:57 AM
Response to Original message |
34. I think it's hard to tell at this stage |
|
any number of retirements could alter races and make them more competitive. I had my doubts about Oregon getting rid of Smith, but it finally happened. Some of it depends on the quality of the candidates. If we can get some high quality candidates, there is a good chance we could pick up a couple more seats.
|
Vinca
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-29-08 08:29 AM
Response to Original message |
36. New Hampshire is turning so blue, I think Gregg can be beaten |
|
if we can come up with a viable candidate.
|
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-29-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message |
38. Hey!. . Where's "ALL OF THE ABOVE" ??. . . N/T |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:32 PM
Response to Original message |