Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who can better beat Specter in '10: Sestak or Matthews? I don't want a Franken repeat!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 08:06 AM
Original message
Who can better beat Specter in '10: Sestak or Matthews? I don't want a Franken repeat!
PA could be a very solid pickup, as it is a blue state and Specter has problems in his own party. Much like the '08 MN race, the republican SHOULD lose, but dem hubris to put a 'star' on the ticket (read Franken) could make the pickup harder than it needs to be!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GarbagemanLB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. Anyone but Chris. I'm sure Specter's team can't wait to start digging through all of Matthew's
off-hand and sometimes off-color remarks he's said on air.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. He's also very unhealthy. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Is there a story behind this?
Or are you just making shit up? I've heard several people mention this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yes, he's had some prolonged absences from Hardball. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. lol
Just lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sestak
Is what Wes Clark should have done in 2004 instead of running for congress. If he picks up a Senate Seat he would be a very good Presidential candidate in 2016.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Clark didn't run for Congress in '04
I assume you meant to type, "instead of running for President."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. LOL yep
If Clark would have got elected maybe ran for govenor in Arkansas or Senate in Arkansas he would have made a more plausible Presidential candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. Sestak, Altmire, Rendell, ANYONE but Tweety!
Please ANYONE but Tweety!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
9. No way that people in PA woud vote for Matthews over Specter. No way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Maybe Matthews believes Specter is retiring?
Who knows. I don't think the '10 midterms will be particularly great for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShadowLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
11. As a PAer I'm 99% certain that Matthews can't beat Specter, Matthews is too controversial
Like you said Franken was a weak candidate, there were plenty of other democrats with far less negatives then him who could probably have won the seat outright on election day without this recount madness.

Rendell would probably be the best guy we could run against Specter, but Rendell isn't interested in running for the senate unfortunately, he's said he wants to retire from politics once his second term as governor is up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Rendell would hands down be the strongest candidate.
But like you, I assume he isn't running. I'm afraid the media/big money will get behind Matthews even if it means better candidates (Sestak) get pushed to the side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. I'm not a praying man...
but I pray for that man's retirement from public life in 2010.

The only way I can see myself volunteering for Tweety in the primary is if Rendell is his opponent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
16. MN'08 was/is not Dem hubris.
Edited on Sat Nov-29-08 11:40 AM by Occam Bandage
It's Franken hubris. The DFL was far from happy about the Franken nomination. There was barely even a primary; Franken brought in tons of out-of-state money and media attention, and that kept most of the actual politicians out of the race. The only people who ran against him were Kucinich-esque professor and complete unknown Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer (who didn't even set foot outside the Minneapolis-St. Paul metro area once during the "campaign"), and perennial self-financed loser Mike Ciresi.

Franken never had the Dems united behind him. At the state convention, he only captured 62% of the delegates, with Nelson-Pallmeyer taking 38% in a mass protest vote (the guy didn't hit double digits in our internal statewide polling). In the September primary (which really is only meaningful for state house candidates, but which all candidates participate in, and which for Senate races is usually only a one-candidate formality in yet another MN quirk), Franken only took 65% of the vote, with the rest going to a pack of vanity candidates with neither financing nor support from anyone but themselves. For comparison, Coleman took 92% of the support in his own party. It's shocking that Franken is as close as he is, given how little MN Democrats like him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. "Kucinich-esque professors"
lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I voted for Jack Nelson-Pallmeyer, both at the caucus and at the convention.
I like him a great deal, and I wanted him to beat Franken at the convention. But he's the type of candidate who realistically never has half a shot; he didn't have any support whatsoever outside young, middle-class-to-affluent progressives living in the Minneapolis/Saint Paul area. A lack of advertising money and a strong, brash, liberal persona will do that to a candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
20. If Specter runs again, neither.
Specter is a pro-choice repuke (and former Democrat) who brings the bacon home to Philadelphia, his home base as a young D.A. back in the day. And unfortunately, it is Philadelphia that gives him the margin of victory (crossover votes from Democrats) in every election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
21. Sestak
Media personalities always overestimate the importance of name recognition when they run for office. Personal relationships are more important. Has Matthews been doing much in PA for the past few years or has he been in NY and DC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-08 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
22. Mathews has name recognition, both a plus and a minus for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC