|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:40 PM Original message |
hey DU?remember when hillary was going to be VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
1. Yep - it was A LOCK! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:42 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. the same people saying the same stuff |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:52 PM Response to Reply #2 |
18. Links, please? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:00 PM Response to Reply #18 |
28. heres links |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:19 PM Response to Reply #28 |
46. So you admit you've got nothing about this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:09 PM Response to Reply #18 |
33. use the google du function and put in Unity Ticket |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:18 PM Response to Reply #33 |
43. No, I mean to real world reporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:19 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. name a name in the obama camp who has said that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:23 PM Response to Reply #44 |
50. Real world reporters aren't 'in the Obama camp' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 03:13 PM Response to Reply #43 |
71. Politico is no more "real world" than Newsmax or World Nut Daily |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 04:11 PM Response to Reply #71 |
77. No; The Guardian, LA Times, Globe and Mail, NYT, NPR, Washington Post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 04:34 PM Response to Reply #77 |
82. And not one of those papers can get an actual human being on record as a source |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
3. Yeah. That was a good time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:43 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. its deja vu |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:45 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Could this be the last of 2008's epic battles? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metric System (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:44 PM Response to Original message |
5. More flamebait from the same ole bunch. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:46 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. and who is the first on the scene with his trusty bic lighter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:22 PM Response to Reply #8 |
49. Ah, What The Fuck, Borrow My Lighter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yourguide (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:47 PM Response to Reply #5 |
13. riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bridgit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Dec-01-08 11:05 AM Response to Reply #5 |
118. yep... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gravity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
6. The news was leaked from the Obama transition team this time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GarbagemanLB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:46 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. All the leaks are from Clinton's people! There is still a chance she won't be S.O.S.!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 03:11 PM Response to Reply #6 |
68. Leaked from the Obama transition team? You have a legitimate link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
9. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
muriel_volestrangler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:51 PM Response to Reply #9 |
17. Me too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
10. No one official from either party verified the Veep thing. chat show and Internet blather. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:53 PM Response to Reply #10 |
22. what NAMED official has confirmed this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 03:12 PM Response to Reply #10 |
69. This is identical, no official has confirmed or denied... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sufrommich (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
12. I predict a chorus of exploding heads here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:48 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. I am going to record it and use it as a ring-tone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:49 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. thats not much of a prediction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sufrommich (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:53 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. I don't know,I'm very fond of Hillary,senator is OK with me, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:57 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. me too she isnt my senator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:27 PM Response to Reply #26 |
52. It's the batshit crazy drama that I have a problem with. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:37 PM Response to Reply #26 |
57. I almost want to see her as SOS so she can finally explain TUZLA for those of us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jrockford (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 06:57 PM Response to Reply #57 |
99. Yeah. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
musicblind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 02:17 PM Response to Reply #21 |
64. I agree. SOS would be nice. But Senator is nice too... I feel she will be a very POWERFUL senator if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
15. It's the drama. Oh, the drama of it all. Yikes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:52 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. do you get the feeling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:53 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. It's PUMA redux. They're baaaaaaaaaaaaaaack. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metric System (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:57 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. You know what? I'm really sick of these kind of accusations just because there are some posters here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:58 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. I read here today that Clinton is the Head of State & would switch places with Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Metric System (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:10 PM Response to Reply #27 |
35. Is that PUMA talk? Really? From what I've seen, PUMAs want her to have nothing to do with an Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:25 PM Response to Reply #35 |
51. it's the same blustery talk about Clinton that as a subtex demeans Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sufrommich (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:28 PM Response to Reply #24 |
53. The goal posts for what constitutes a "Puma" here have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:37 PM Response to Reply #53 |
58. It's batshit crazy Clinton drama 24/7, baby! Woooooo!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sufrommich (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:42 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. I'd be interested in seeing a link to the post,sounds like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:44 PM Response to Reply #59 |
61. of course it's not the real world and thank gawd for that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 04:41 PM Response to Reply #59 |
83. Well, this was one of the them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seaglass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 02:51 PM Response to Reply #58 |
67. And since we know by your last thread you believe everything you read |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 04:22 PM Response to Reply #67 |
78. Automatic disbelief is as harmful to a democracy as blind allegiance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 03:39 PM Response to Reply #58 |
73. Well, that certainly settles it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 04:29 PM Response to Reply #73 |
80. Why are the Clinton First horde here at DU surprised when people push back? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 06:24 PM Response to Reply #80 |
89. You seem to be stuck |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 09:41 PM Response to Reply #89 |
110. Oh BS. The horde attacks anyone & everything deemed not sufficiently worshipful of Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-30-08 01:10 PM Response to Reply #110 |
112. There is a HUGE difference |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-30-08 01:23 PM Response to Reply #112 |
114. Regardless of what you think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 05:32 PM Response to Reply #53 |
87. I contend that PUMA has been redefined to not at all be about Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 06:44 PM Response to Reply #87 |
92. Earlier this month you denied that PUMAs even exist. Now you seek to redefine a non-entity. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 06:49 PM Response to Reply #92 |
93. I contend the concept of those who piss all over "party unity" are the ones who are most likely to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 06:50 PM Response to Reply #93 |
94. Then quit throwing it around so much, you've been quite active with it lately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 06:51 PM Response to Reply #94 |
95. Um... what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 06:53 PM Response to Reply #95 |
96. You've been calling people PUMA a lot in the last few days. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 06:55 PM Response to Reply #96 |
98. I did twice in one single thread. A locked thread that was blatant flamebait |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 06:58 PM Response to Reply #98 |
100. I'd also seen your redefinition a couple of times. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 07:01 PM Response to Reply #100 |
101. Now you're just pulling shit out of your ass. Just that one thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 07:03 PM Response to Reply #101 |
102. I'm don't catalogue what's going on here. I saw you comment here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PeaceNikki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 07:04 PM Response to Reply #102 |
103. Awesome. I am sure I'm in good company. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dinger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:34 PM Response to Reply #24 |
56. Right Again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:14 PM Original message |
i think a "The Clintons" situation comedy about a modern connected power couple and their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
greguganus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
55. That would be a hit! And all the rumors about them could be acted out on the show. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Whisp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 04:56 PM Response to Reply #55 |
84. add Uncle John McCain who yells expletives at the kid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
23. Actually, no, I don't remember that, because it never happened and is a stupid analogy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 12:57 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Oh BS. They insisted Clinton could overturn the primary results at the convention. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:02 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. Who do you mean by "they"? Obama's camp? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:05 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. "they" means Clinton sycophants at DU that get all blustery when it comes to the Clintons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:12 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. Your definition of "they" is precisely why you are wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:14 PM Response to Reply #36 |
39. "they" is a faction that promotes blustery talk about Clinton that demeans Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atimetocome (236 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 04:58 PM Response to Reply #39 |
85. I think anyone who demeans Hillary or Bill demeans Obama. Both |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sufrommich (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:16 PM Response to Reply #36 |
42. And "they "in terms of DU posts is also a pretty good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 03:45 PM Response to Reply #30 |
76. As opposed to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 04:26 PM Response to Reply #76 |
79. The Clinton First crowd keep pushing and pushing & are surprised when people bush back. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 06:25 PM Response to Reply #79 |
91. Is "push back" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
11 Bravo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 07:35 PM Response to Reply #91 |
104. Now it's "bush" back. I believe it has something to do with the way one combs one's pubic hair. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 09:38 PM Response to Reply #91 |
109. and a typo turns you into a low-hanging fruit-picker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polmaven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-30-08 01:02 PM Response to Reply #109 |
111. If you will open your eyes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-30-08 01:24 PM Response to Reply #111 |
115. more low-hanging fruit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:10 PM Response to Reply #25 |
34. That is true. People were saying that the supers would feel bad about not supporting her for VP... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:16 PM Response to Reply #34 |
41. I think some people here either forget or support revisionist history. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:21 PM Response to Reply #23 |
48. You're right, zlt234, it didn't happen, and it is a stupid analogy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inuca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
31. It's different. Unfortunately n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:08 PM Response to Original message |
32. It might have happened had he not heard from us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:43 PM Response to Reply #32 |
60. Contact the transition team: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
37. I get teary when I think of what might have been.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:14 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. howd that date go? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC_SKP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:46 PM Response to Reply #38 |
62. there was collateral damage... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:47 PM Response to Reply #62 |
63. i saw that too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AJH032 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
40. No, I don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tribetime (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:19 PM Response to Original message |
45. I don't recall that at all n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:20 PM Response to Original message |
47. Damn, I thought my brother's 3 year old had a lock on being childish. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabbycat31 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 01:32 PM Response to Original message |
54. I'm still a newbie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spiritual_gunfighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
65. Hopefully |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
S_E_Fudd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
66. No...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
70. How can we forget? "He HAS to choose her, she got 18 million votes!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blue_onyx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
72. No, I don't remember that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wyldwolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 03:43 PM Response to Original message |
74. perhaps you can link some threads showing that. I don't remember that at all? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jennicut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 03:45 PM Response to Original message |
75. I could care less either way. Why can't we let Obama make up his own mind either way? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Grinchie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
81. Is Peter Paul vs. Clinton going to be settled by January 20th? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tandem5 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
86. I don't remember that - never was it a "done deal." nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dj13Francis (343 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 06:19 PM Response to Original message |
88. I don't remember that at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
90. And Democratic Nominee, of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 06:53 PM Response to Original message |
97. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-30-08 01:21 PM Response to Reply #97 |
113. Deleted message |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 08:44 PM Response to Original message |
105. Seems like yesterday... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erin Elizabeth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 08:57 PM Response to Reply #105 |
108. Yep. I had a big Hillary supporter co-worker tell me with a huge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Life Long Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
106. Fact, Obama would lose without her on the VP ticket. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Erin Elizabeth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-29-08 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
107. Oh yeah. I remember Hillary being "inevitable" as the nominee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-30-08 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
116. So are you predicting that Clinton will not be the Secretary of State nominee? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Nov-30-08 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
117. Hell, I remember when Hillary was inevitably going to be President. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC