Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Richardson, Obama Teams Trade Blame

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 03:58 PM
Original message
Richardson, Obama Teams Trade Blame
WP, pg1: Richardson, Obama Teams Trade Blame
By Carol D. Leonnig and Michael D. Shear
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, January 6, 2009; Page A01

Weeks before President-elect Barack Obama chose New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson to head the Commerce Department, a small group of volunteers with ethics, tax and investigative expertise -- most of them lawyers -- scoured his background looking for embarrassing facts or political problems. But the team underestimated a potential time bomb -- a grand jury investigation that had been focusing on Richardson's gubernatorial office. The investigation had been widely reported, but Richardson seemed convinced that the probe, which involved a campaign donor, was not likely to thwart his Senate confirmation.

Yesterday, however, Richardson abruptly withdrew from consideration. In the preceding weeks, the extent to which he had underestimated the seriousness of the FBI investigation became obvious both to Obama's vetting team and to Richardson's own staff.

Sources within the transition and the Justice Department said that Richardson had played down the importance of the probe and did not reveal that his office and staff could be at risk. The seriousness of the matter became apparent after the FBI began its own background check on Dec. 2.

But Richardson's longtime aides defended his disclosures, noting that subjects under examination by a grand jury are rarely aware of its secret deliberations. "This was out there, and he told them," said a senior Richardson aide, speaking on the condition of anonymity because of the ongoing investigation. "I feel that they just missed the boat on it. The FBI or the campaign or something. I don't think it's fair that this is being portrayed as him holding anything back."...

***

A Richardson aide said the governor did "nothing wrong" and noted that New Mexico news outlets had reported on the federal grand jury probe starting in August, when officials at the Finance Authority were first interviewed by the FBI about the agency's selection of CDR Financial and its president, David Rubin, a Richardson donor. But a source with the Obama transition said Richardson's disclosures to the team were incomplete. A Justice Department source also said Richardson neglected to mention the ongoing investigation on a background-check questionnaire.

FBI agents assigned to comb his background learned independently that an inquiry was underway in New Mexico, the source said. Staff members in the deputy attorney general's office relayed the existence of a "significant" probe -- but no details of the investigation -- to senior members of the transition team....

***

Pendleton James, who led the vetting process for President Ronald Reagan's nominees, called the situation "astounding." "Come on, they just found this out yesterday?" he asked. "If this was some misdemeanor, I could understand, but . . . a grand jury investigation anywhere near a sitting governor?"

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/05/AR2009010503047.html?nav%3Dhcmodule&sub=AR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. There's an annoying trend to be quiet when they should speak, and pipe up when they should be quiet
There was no reason to slag Richardson and his people except to make themselves look like victims. With something like this coming to light, any sane and fairminded person would think that they hadn't delved deep enough into Richardson's current affairs. They should have just said that they regretted his withdrawal or something even more noncommital. Instead, they had to remind everyone of their perfection, which seems to be pretty important for them to have everyone thinking.

Here's what's disturbing: after a studied career of ducking controversy and avoiding tough issues, this team realizes that they're going to have to stand up and be specific now and then. For some reason, though, they seem to pick fights that are best left alone. This is an example, and the Burris situation is an extreme example. At least they got the Feinstein flap right and tweaked the story so it looked like they had just been a little unaware of or insensitive to protocol; by apologizing there, they did themselves a world of good. This, however, is just silly.

Richardson's a fool, and an embattled fool is a dangerous one. It's best to just leave that and let it run its course; if they engage in some blame-gaming, it just makes both sides look incompetent, petty and deceptive, and that's ruinous. He's bumbled along as an embarrassment throughout the process, and now he looks not only disloyal to the Clintons, but is starting to look like that to the Obama team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, the corporatemediawhores
Edited on Tue Jan-06-09 05:26 PM by zidzi
claiming a feud between Dems. Instead of "sources"..Obama and Richardson need to make a statement on this.

Corporate media brought us the bushits for 8 years and the War On Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. And it appears that some in "essence" above are buying the bullshit
Edited on Tue Jan-06-09 05:32 PM by FrenchieCat
and running with it, while assigning blame....cause they ain't got shit else to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. shhh, haven't you heard
NBC banned Coulter for life. :rofl:
























:hide:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. The manufactured rift between DiFi and the Obama camp was disgusting
Sadly, it was front page on Huffington Post. I would have thought better of the liberal blogs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JayMusgrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I'm with you!!!!!!!!! This is all printed in some source to keep readership
There is no "there" there!

I wish it were June now, and Obama were in command, Bush was facing multiple national and international indictments, and Cheney were in GTMO, or somewhere in a Russian prison awaiting international trial. Gonzo, Rummy, and others all held in-communicado somewhere...without lawyers, facing water boarding daily....

This bull crap about Richardson, over a possibly questionable $100,000 total series of donations to his Governor's campaign, and a $1.5 million contract in a small state with budget in the few billions........this is all some right wing media circus.

I say forget it, and go for the juicy meat, Bush-2, first President of the USA to be convicted of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and launching wars on innocent people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Right..the sooner everyone realizes
that corporatemedia is public enemy number one the sooner we move forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I'm not one to forget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-09 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. No, not
you:fistbump:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC