Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Women Senators Come Together to Support Fair Pay Act (February 7, 2009)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Captain_Nemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 08:40 PM
Original message
Women Senators Come Together to Support Fair Pay Act (February 7, 2009)
Edited on Sat Feb-07-09 08:41 PM by Captain_Nemo
http://thenewagenda.net/2009/02/07/women-senators-come-together-to-support-fair-pay-act/

by Jane Smith

Jane Smith blogs at Unapologetic Feminist.

"On January 22, 2009, at 6:17 p.m., something remarkable and historic took place on the floor of U.S. Senate. You may think that I am talking about the passage of the Lily Ledbetter Act, but I am not. The momentous event I am talking about is even more profound than the Lilly Ledbetter Act itself, and is revealed in the Senate roll call vote from that night.

A total of 97 votes were cast in the Senate on the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. In order for the bill to be passed by the Senate, a 3/5 majority is required, or in this case, a total of 59 votes. The bill passed with 61 votes, so it was not a landslide.

~snip~


"...However, upon analysis of the Republican vote, a dramatic gender divide is evident. Of the 41 Republicans in the U.S. Senate, only four are women. All four women voted yea, or 100% of Republican female Senators voted in favor of the Lily Ledbetter Act. Only one male Republican Senator, Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, voted yea, or 2.7% of Republican male senators.

These are striking statistics. Are we to believe that women crossed political party lines to vote in support of women’s rights, simply because they happen to be women? Yes. Are we to believe that women from all wavelengths of the political spectrum have the scruples to vote for women’s rights, even when it requires going against their own party? Yes. Are we to believe that one political party does not have the monopoly on female empowerment? Yes. Are we to believe that the gender of our representatives makes a difference in how they vote on issues affecting women? Hell Yes!

Perhaps one could argue that with such a paltry statistical sampling of 4 women, we shouldn’t jump to conclusions. However, due to the lack of gender equity in Congress, we’re entitled to a little extrapolation.
Another dramatic twist in this story is the impact that these Republican women made on the fate of the bill. The Ledbetter Act passed by a slim margin. If three of those Republican women had voted nay, then the bill would have been defeated. Their votes were necessary to bring the vote home for all women. So, ultimately, it was the Republican women who tipped the scales in our favor.

In politics, it is never easy to go against the grain. So, let’s thank the brave Republican women who took one for the team. Thank you, Kay Hutchison from Texas, Olympia Snowe of Maine, Susan Collins of Maine, and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska.
By the way, does anyone else find it nauseating that this remarkable unification of women was overlooked by the mainstream media? It appears that they are too busy reporting on the adolescent male fantasy of a catfight between Sarah Palin and Ashley Judd. I guess we need more women running the newsrooms too!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Repub women were at least smart enough to do the right thing here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain_Nemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Of the four women senators the Repubs have...they are all pro-choice
Kay Bailey says she's pro-life but has made it clear she is not for overturning Roe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-07-09 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Good.
At least they get it that women's rights are important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC