Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Krugman: "Lemon Socialism" aka "the Geithner put"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 08:33 PM
Original message
Krugman: "Lemon Socialism" aka "the Geithner put"
"People tend to forget this, but we were on the edge of a major banking crisis in the early 90s. it wasn’t just the S&Ls; commercial banks were in trouble too, largely because of big losses on commercial real estate. And I remember a conversation I had back then with economists at the New York Fed, one of whom declared that the only reason Citibank (as it then was) had a positive market value was the “FDIC put.” That is, part of the Citi’s downside was in fact covered by taxpayers, who were guaranteeing deposits whatever happened, while all of the upside belonged to the stockholders.

As it turned out, a combination of low interest rates and then the great Clinton-era boom meant that this put option was never exercised. But that episode came back to me as I parse stories about the Obama administration’s apparent emerging plan for bank rescue.

If the reports are right, the plan is to buy up some of the troubled assets — but only those that have already been written way down. The Obama team doesn’t want to buy up the assets that haven’t been written down. For the rest, the Feds will offer a guarantee protecting the banks against large losses. As best I understand it, the reason not to buy up assets that haven’t been written down is that paying book value would be an obviously bad deal for taxpayers, while paying a low price would devastate banks’ reported capital, a process sometimes known as “recognizing reality.” So the really important part of the bailout will involve providing what we have to call the “Geithner put”: taxpayers will assume a large part of the downside risk. This might — might — work out OK, just as the FDIC put of the early 90s did. But let’s be clear what this is: it is lemon socialism, pure and simple: socialized losses, privatized profits."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Right On, Dr. Krugman
Thanks, Larry Summers! You rock!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-08-09 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Without the correct stimulus in place however, there might not be a boom.
Or congess could follow the Clinton play book and raise taxes and regulate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC