Uzybone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-09-09 08:55 PM
Original message |
HuffPo got a question, and it was one of the best of the night |
|
regarding investigating the Bush crimes.
|
EraOfResponsibility
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-09-09 08:56 PM
Response to Original message |
1. What did you think of the President's answer? |
|
I thought it was okay. He did say those who are found guilty should be prosecuted or something like that
|
mucifer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-09-09 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. " no one is above the law" |
Desimal
(19 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-09-09 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. But generally speaking, let's move foward, not backward |
|
Ambiguity again. We'll see.
|
JuniperLea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-09-09 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
I think he's just saying his office won't look into it, but that no one is above the law and people who break the law should be prosecuted.
|
EraOfResponsibility
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-09-09 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. He said that to George S earlier this year |
Uzybone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-09-09 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
those who want Bush investigated yesterday will definitely not be satisfied. I am just happy he did not take it off the table.
|
choie
(899 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-09-09 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
7. If I hear him say one more time that he |
|
prefers to get things right going forward rather than look back, I'm going to throw up!
|
RC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-09-09 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
13. But first they have to be investigated and charged. |
|
Otherwise his words are just that, words.
|
EraOfResponsibility
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-09-09 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. I feel that he left that door open in his answer, though |
oldtime dfl_er
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-09-09 08:56 PM
Response to Original message |
|
And HuffPost is legitimized! Love it!
|
jefferson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-09-09 09:03 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Sam Stein in the House! |
Mira
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-09-09 09:21 PM
Response to Original message |
10. The way he handled it gave him a perfect nine in the poll on some other post. |
|
Too much waffling. Too much evasion. Too much non-committment I'm not happy about his weaving through the choppy waters not taking a firm stand.
|
Stephanie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-09-09 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. No one is above the law"" is a very firm stand |
|
I was very impressed that he was so clear and direct.
|
yodermon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-09-09 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
17. He's not gonna pre-empt his own Dept. of Justice. |
|
Hell, he didn't even want to pre-empt his treasury secretary!
|
K Gardner
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-09-09 09:23 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Huff Po Rocks with question about "secretive" military flag-draped coffins ! Good for them ! |
Danger Mouse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-09-09 09:49 PM
Response to Original message |
15. So Obama is saying that he won't object to Congress *cough* *cough* doing some investigations. |
ginnyinWI
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-09-09 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
18. I would think Congress would be the best body to do it, too. |
|
Hearings hearings and more hearings--then a few actions by the Atty. Gen. would be the ticket.
|
redstate_democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Feb-09-09 09:52 PM
Response to Original message |
16. I was happy they got a question. |
|
And it was one of the better ones.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:43 PM
Response to Original message |