Cash_thatswhatiwant
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-12-09 04:42 PM
Original message |
WH press office surprised by Gregg's drop out; got no heads up! |
|
Edited on Thu Feb-12-09 04:43 PM by Cash_thatswhatiwant
per msnbc
|
demo dutch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-12-09 04:44 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I'm sure GOP pressured Gregg to get out, all in line with undermining Obama |
|
Edited on Thu Feb-12-09 04:44 PM by demo dutch
|
Window
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-12-09 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
11. You are probably correct. The republicans are so afraid of President Obama, |
|
there is no telling how low they will go. Very tacky of Gregg not to speak with the President first.
Like you say, anything to undermine President Obama.
|
Thrill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-12-09 04:44 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Classy Republican. Coward waited until Obama left Washington to do it |
|
Edited on Thu Feb-12-09 04:45 PM by Thrill
Obama will learn to stop trying to sleep with these assholes
|
Jane Austin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-12-09 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Gregg looks bad and Obama looks like a reasonable man who lived up to his promise to include Republicans in his cabinet.
This is a win/win for Obama.
|
terisan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-12-09 04:45 PM
Response to Original message |
3. If so, Gregg was rude. -Should have made joint statement. nt |
Phx_Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-12-09 04:46 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Republicans are all about class. |
|
Edited on Thu Feb-12-09 04:48 PM by Phx_Dem
The polls are showing -- in a pretty big way -- that the public thinks Obama has tried to be bi-partisan and the GOP has rejected his efforts. This is just going to be one more notch in Obama's belt and another black mark for the No-Party.
:toast:
|
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-12-09 04:48 PM
Response to Original message |
6. The bad thing is that it takes away from Obama's message. This will take away from his |
|
victory...at least in the media's narrative. They're calling it "a serious blow."
|
Fleshdancer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-12-09 04:48 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Howard Dean issues aside, it's days like this I'm glad Rahm is on OUR side. :evilgrin:
|
Jennicut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-12-09 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. Rahm is a Rethug ball buster. |
monmouth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-12-09 04:50 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Personally I'm relieved he's out. Didn't trust him, especially when he wouldn't vote.. |
sufrommich
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-12-09 04:51 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Running scared,the republicans can't even go face to face |
|
with the Obama administration. Just heard on MSNBC that Obama's favorables are up to 59% (up from 52%).
|
CoffeeCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-12-09 05:01 PM
Response to Original message |
12. The scum-sucking neocon criminals.... |
|
....are worried as hell that a man of integrity, honesty and character just might change Washington, DC--and make their revolting brand of political thuggery--a thing of the past.
So, they attempt to squelch any sort of rational and decent behavior.
We can't have people being healthy and diplomatic--and actually governing like adults can we?
The monsters don't want to let any light in. They're all about the darkness and they'll do anything to continue their despicable status quo.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:30 PM
Response to Original message |