democrattotheend
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-12-09 05:15 PM
Original message |
Gregg says he's not running for re-election, so we still get an open seat |
|
In many ways, this may work out better for us than having a moderate Republican who could actually win in New Hampshire be appointed. http://thepage.time.com/2009/02/12/gregg-out-at-commerce/?xid=rss-page
|
endarkenment
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-12-09 05:16 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Best would be for Judd to run again 'cause his number is up. |
Phx_Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-12-09 05:19 PM
Response to Original message |
2. From a GOP standpoint, wouldn't it have been better |
|
to have Gregg's replacement, a conservative Republican, hold that seat and then run for relection in 2010? As it is now, they will have no incumbent on the ticket in 2010.
High fives and fist bumps for us!
:fistbump:
|
Kahuna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-12-09 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. Yep! I'm sure the repuke leadership put Gregg up to it to give Obama.. |
|
a black eye. But, it really give the repukes yet another black eye as they continue to circle their wagans to all things Obama.
|
Thrill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-12-09 05:21 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Stay tuned.....There has to be more to this |
AlinPA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-12-09 06:09 PM
Response to Original message |
5. No, don't trust him; he promised to take the job at Commerce so don't believe him |
|
when he says he won't run for re-election. He is a liar.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:45 AM
Response to Original message |