Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Andrew Sullivan Nails it: Gregg Was Pwned

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mikiturner Donating Member (581 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:53 PM
Original message
Andrew Sullivan Nails it: Gregg Was Pwned
Edited on Thu Feb-12-09 05:54 PM by mikiturner
It gets clearer. When Judd Gregg approached the Obama administration to see if he could be a part of it, he was assuming that his own party wasn't going to adopt a policy of total warfare against the newly elected president in a time of enormous economic peril. Between that moment and the current all-out ideological assault on Obama, his position became untenable. His recusal on the stimulus package provoked fury at home (check out the comments here) and dyspepsia among the GOP who are intent on responding to an open hand with a clenched fist.

I have to say even I am a little taken aback by the force of the Republican assault. Even in a downturn as swift and alarming as this one, even after an election that clearly favored one approach over another, even after the most conciliatory efforts by an incoming president in memory, these people have gone to war against the president. The president should stay cool. The rest of us should realize what motivates the GOP: the opportunism of selective ideology.


Yep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yup...my post on Gregg was along those lines but less eloquent. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Working link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
34. unless there were other reasons not known yet, Gregg should have
manned up and done for his country first. Now he has to go back to a party that hates him and a constituency that may not elect him again. Way to go, Gregg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
36. Juddhead was meekly following orders from Rush 'Draft-Dodger' Limbaugh (R- Drug Abuser)
Edited on Sun Feb-15-09 08:35 AM by SpiralHawk
Doing his part as a Republicon Homelander to make sure America fails.

Juddhead -- It's a Granite State of Mind


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. The GOP's assault is not just against Obama and Dems, but against moderate Republicans as well.
Which is political suicide, of course, given the direction this country is trending, politically speaking.

But, hey, more power to them in their endeavors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. If they keep this up, they're going to selectively ideologize themselves into oblivion.
Not that I'm complaining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. The "moderates" - Collins, Snowe, Arlen, don't seem to feel like
they're under siege. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. They will.
Watch the level of vitriol towards the "traitors".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Did they get the memo that the RNC
is already raising money for their republican opponets in the next race? I thought that showed a particularly outrageous touch of petulance.

Hopefully, the voters won't be duped by the "illegitimate black baby" leaks that come out against these senators in the next race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. Think again
The wingnuts are already trying to get rid of Specter (the only one of the 3 up for election in 2010).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #19
28. did you see Specter on the Laura Ingraham? for example...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/10/specter-to-ingraham-dont_n_165648.html

INGRAHAM: Is it nice to be wined and dined at the White House? And, you're treated pretty well when you're a Republican bucking other Republicans, right Senator?

SPECTER: Now let's get off it Laura. I'm not drinking any wine at the White House and I don't dine at the White House. If the president wants to talk to me -- I talk to him and I make my own independent judgment. Don't give me the wine and dine baloney, young lady.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Watch or listen to a hate radio hostess?
I'd rather pass a walnut-sized kidney stone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. well I didn't listen to her either
I picked this up on the Intertubes. The point is he is getting grief from the base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wonderful picture! Too bad Daschle is erroneously in it.
The GOP ate his lunch. Probably ate his grandbabies. No wonder he caved.

But a Democrat in and proceed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikiturner Donating Member (581 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'm gonna edit it out at some point
Just being lazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. More from Sullivan ...
The GOP Has Declared War On Obama

This much is now clear. Their clear and open intent is to do all they can, however they can, to sabotage the new administration (and the economy to boot). They want failure. Even now. Even after the last eight years. Even in a recession as steeply dangerous as this one. There are legitimate debates to be had; and then there is the cynicism and surrealism of total political war. We now should have even less doubt about what kind of people they are. And the mountain of partisan vitriol Obama will have to climb every day of the next four or eight years.

link

(Boldface mine. Pretty harsh words, but justified.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Nailed it
and now we need to return the favor and declare all out war on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueMTexpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm not entirely a Sullivan fan, but he certainly "gets" it here.
And yes, he has said it so well. What motivates the GOP is simply the opportunism of selective ideology.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib_wit_it Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I like Sullivan way more in print than in person. Good points here, but he should stay off my tv.
He just creeps me out. He's got that indescribably slimy manner that Republicans almost have patented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
30. I read him regularly--good insights on politics. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm thinking Obama punked 'em with this nomination.
Judd may have an Abramoff problem:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5039324

Here's the White House statement:
"Senator Gregg reached out to the President and offered his name for Secretary of Commerce. He was very clear throughout the interviewing process that despite past disagreements about policies, he would support, embrace, and move forward with the President's agenda. Once it became clear after his nomination that Senator Gregg was not going to be supporting some of President Obama's key economic priorities, it became necessary for Senator Gregg and the Obama administration to part ways. We regret that he has had a change of heart".
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x8192284
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. Obama will stay cool...Everything now points to their total crushing in 2010
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. Miki, your link's not working!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikiturner Donating Member (581 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Grr, can't edit anymore
link

andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/02/gregg-was-pwned.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. So why be "conciliatory"? THAT is what baffles me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
31. why be conciliatory? simple...
There are several reasons why Obama may, with each new bill, start by being conciliatory.

1. A large chunk of the US voted for McCain/Palin. Not *all* of these people are rightwing fundie nutcases. Many of them are decent people, but either don't follow politics closely or bought the lies. Some of them are simply not terribly bright. But some are so decent they can't even concieve of Bush/Cheney/Rove levels of evil, which is why they bought the lies to begin with. They will eventually see how they were duped, and when they do, their minds will turn, hard.

But first, they need to see, over and over again, Obama reaching out with an open hand. And they need to see the rethugs meeting that hand with a clenched fist.

2. Think about how outraged and furious we were to have rethug shit shoved down our throats for the last 8 years. As tempting as it is to give them back some of their own, it will only create that much more rage on the other side, and will turn moderates into extremists. Not helpful over the long haul. So he gives the rethugs a chance to play, they trip all over themselves being the obstructionist scum that they are...and then he can say, with complete honesty and sincerity, "Well, we gave them all they asked for and they still aren't happy. Guess we just have to move forward without them."

3. Obama promised to change how politics are done in DC. He is living up to that promise. But change starts with him.
He can't change how the rethugs choose to behave, of course. Only they can do that. But what he can do is reach out with an open hand, let them swing their fists until they've exposed themselves totally...and then nicely smack them down. Reminds me of my karate instructor reaching a hand out to a misbehaving student...and with a slight twist of 1 finger and thumb, dropping him to his knees.

A few broken patellas, and the rethugs may learn to mind their manners. In the meantime, be nice and keep that iron fist inside the velvet glove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
32. why be conciliatory? simple...
There are several reasons why Obama may, with each new bill, start by being conciliatory.

1. A large chunk of the US voted for McCain/Palin. Not *all* of these people are rightwing fundie nutcases. Many of them are decent people, but either don't follow politics closely or bought the lies. Some of them are simply not terribly bright. But some are so decent they can't even concieve of Bush/Cheney/Rove levels of evil, which is why they bought the lies to begin with. They will eventually see how they were duped, and when they do, their minds will turn, hard.

But first, they need to see, over and over again, Obama reaching out with an open hand. And they need to see the rethugs meeting that hand with a clenched fist.

2. Think about how outraged and furious we were to have rethug shit shoved down our throats for the last 8 years. As tempting as it is to give them back some of their own, it will only create that much more rage on the other side, and will turn moderates into extremists. Not helpful over the long haul. So he gives the rethugs a chance to play, they trip all over themselves being the obstructionist scum that they are...and then he can say, with complete honesty and sincerity, "Well, we gave them all they asked for and they still aren't happy. Guess we just have to move forward without them."

3. Obama promised to change how politics are done in DC. He is living up to that promise. But change starts with him.
He can't change how the rethugs choose to behave, of course. Only they can do that. But what he can do is reach out with an open hand, let them swing their fists until they've exposed themselves totally...and then nicely smack them down. Reminds me of my karate instructor reaching a hand out to a misbehaving student...and with a slight twist of 1 finger and thumb, dropping him to his knees.

A few broken patellas, and the rethugs may learn to mind their manners. In the meantime, be nice and keep that iron fist inside the velvet glove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
33. Because it makes Obama look like the bigger man
There is no need to punch a loser in the face to prove they are a loser when it is patently obvious to everyone they are a loser to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. The GOP Has Placed Itself Into The Untenable Position Where...
it is more important for them ideologically for Obama to fail than it is for the nation to survive economic calamity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalsince1968 Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
18. He was flawed from the get go and never should have been chosen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
20. It just is more glaring proof that these bastards have no intention of playing ball,
Edited on Thu Feb-12-09 10:51 PM by calimary
OR acknowledging that their way got SHELLACKED last November.

Hey 'CONS, you still can't read the writing on the wall?

Oh, silly me - I forgot. They're still clinging to that alternate reality that they create - while the rest of us in the truly "reality-based community" are merely supposed to study what they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
22. They're still breathing in the vapors of The Moral Majority...
same stance, different decade.

Thought I recognized their 'righteous' clenched fists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
23. No votes, or not voting don't affect the outcome
Only the yes votes matter in the matter of cloture. After cloture, the dems have enough votes to carry it. He wouldn't have been approved because his aide was just caught in the Abramhoff scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-12-09 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
25. Worthy of a kick
...and Recommendation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
27. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC