Hamlette
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-13-09 06:19 PM
Original message |
Schuster is the best news program on TV right now. 1600 PA Ave. |
|
He has sort of a stiff style but he is with us! He just had Krugman on and was agreeing with everything he said about how stupid the GOP is (tax cuts). He also seems to have more news than KO and Rachel and he doesn't (so far) get to cute. (I don't like when Rachel does props like hats and megaphones. She comes off as an idiot. She shouldn't try so hard to be like Jon Stewart.)
Anyway, when Schuster first took over for Gregory he was horrid and I stopped watching for awhile. Glad I started watching again.
|
HughMoran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-13-09 06:20 PM
Response to Original message |
grantcart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-13-09 06:21 PM
Response to Original message |
2. He also goes more to the meat of the argument - I agree with you 100% |
Parker CA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-13-09 06:22 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Fri Feb-13-09 06:35 PM by Parker CA
His "hypocrisy watch" is always awesome. Tore into Rove nicely today for claiming this stimulus is the largest peace-time spending bill ever, which comes only four months after he said that Obama was the first president to be elected into office while the country is at war.
|
DeepBlueC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-13-09 06:22 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I quake with laughter when Rachel does the split screens |
|
so much so that I'm calling it aerobic exercise! But I agree that Schuster is excellent.
|
firedupdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-13-09 06:24 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Schuster just asked this idiot if he was concerned about the |
|
trillions spent on the Iraq war. He can't even answer the question.
|
camera obscura
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-13-09 06:25 PM
Response to Original message |
6. He takes show/story suggestions on his Twitter account. And he reads the messages he gets. |
elizm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-13-09 06:30 PM
Response to Original message |
7. I agree! Been noticing that myself. nt |
Hamlette
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-13-09 06:38 PM
Response to Original message |
8. He's talking about Africa!! What? Foreign affairs on the US news show? |
|
Foreign affairs that's not mostly about us?
Get out. That's what BBC does, not the US.
He is refreshing and as someone said, informative.
He's going to keep count on how long Zimbabwae keeps Bennett (the good guy) in custody and called for some country to overthrow the illegal government there that is starving its people.
|
Raine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-13-09 07:21 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I watch him everyday and he's really improved. :thumbsup:
|
Political Tiger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-13-09 07:32 PM
Response to Original message |
10. I've always liked Schuster |
|
He's cute, in a kinda goofy way, but he always has his facts together and unlike someone like David Gregory, it doesn't let his guests get away with spouting the same old GOP talking points without challenging them.
|
ErinBerin84
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-13-09 07:38 PM
Response to Original message |
11. yes, he's soooo much better than Gregory was in that spot. |
|
And he is trying to make the show into his own.
|
Yes We Did
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-13-09 07:41 PM
Response to Original message |
12. I wouldn't know... Blinko is to random with their MSNBC stream... |
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-13-09 11:18 PM
Response to Original message |
13. He's with us .... TODAY...... |
|
... he's had his moments where it was hard to tell.
|
AtomicKitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-13-09 11:31 PM
Response to Original message |
14. I'm becoming a Schuster fan. n/t |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 14th 2024, 04:32 AM
Response to Original message |