Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boehner says that "not one member of Congress" read the Stim. Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:50 AM
Original message
Boehner says that "not one member of Congress" read the Stim. Bill
Edited on Sat Feb-14-09 01:28 AM by Clio the Leo
I'm watching CSPAN's review of the days events. Boehner makes this big show of putting the Stim bill on the podium in front of him, "all 700 pages of it ..... a billion dollars for every page." and of course the thing is a foot high.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/29187445#29185695

Then he said, "I can promise you not one member of Congress read {the bill}."

Granted, it's not practical to expect them to sit down at their desks and read the thing cover to cover. That's why they have staff. But WHY admit that? It's just admitting that they were (seemingly) uninformed.

Sheesh.

Oh, and by the way, apparently they all tried to act in a bipartisan manner and the mean old President wouldn't let them. That's the Reader's Digest version anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not according to Louise Slaughter - she said that the door was opened and they didn't bother to show
up.

Boehner - go have another martini. I swear that man is drunk out of his mind 24/7.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. I think this just gives further support to the Presiden'ts strategy....
..... which I'm now convinced is not so much to actually WORK with the GOP, but to show the American people that he is trying.

If the GOP is standing up in front of the press going, "no WE tried to be bipartisan and THEY didn't!" (paraphrasing)

Well ..... I think the President is on to something, lemme just say that. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
36. I agree, I believe that is his strategy as well...
It is a win/win strategy, imo. The Obama Administration wins if the repubs, as they just did, continue with an obstructionist agenda because the American people voted for a CHANGE in how things are done and the Administration wins if the repubs were to actually work FOR CHANGE.

No downside either way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
22. OMG! You pegged him. He looks like a 60's style lounge lizard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kcass1954 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #22
35. All he needs is a leisure suit, preferably in light green. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
29. I call him Congressman Undercoating
He looks like a sleazy cars salesman.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. The willfully uniformed is what this guy represents.
Ready to slime a bill he didn't even bother to read! Sounds familiar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. I guess Boner forgot to mention they don't read most of the bills.
Which is a problem but not one that is unique to the bill in question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. thank you!
I just said the same thing on one of the WVU boards


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
51. They didn't read the Patriot Act either. They just saluted sieg heil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. I really feel like writing something really profane
obscene, filthy, and disgusting in reply to this but it would reflect poorly on my favorite message board. I need to take up meditation again because the hatefulness that boils up in me can't be hurting THEM much. I do wish I could send a magic mojo conjure on his ass....something really awful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. It was my understanding that they broke it up into sections and groups of
shitheels read each section....and then played show and tell...

Unlike the patriot act which no one read.....



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
46. Yeah, remember that one? It was kinda important.
Or how about that mortgage change a republicaint put into a bill at the very last minute (it was 250 pages or some such nonsense). No one could read it , which is how they managed to put one over on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. I believe they are criminals in every sense of the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
8. It's funny cause he's trying to destroy the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
9. added the video to the OP. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
10. This puke along with cantor are the worse one's to listen to...
I can't stand boner with those big goopy eyes and that spray on tan. He reminds me of some drunk that would bug the shit out of you at a party or something. Ick! Every time I see him I remember him passing out cigarette lobbiest checks...just saw a video someone posted on that the other day.

What a jerk! (I'm trying to stop saying douche)

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
41. (What a terrific picture of our First Family)
(I love them so much)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
11. Why ? What the hell do they do for the money we pay them then?
Can't we just fire the whole entire kit & caboodle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
12. And what's your excuse, Boehner? Too busy being a goddamn crybaby all the time?


Stick a bottle of warm milk in it, motherfucker. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
50. WAHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
13. Stupid excuse. Where was all this concern from the GOP when Congress was given the 1000+ page
Patriot Act back in October 2001 and not enough time to read it before passing it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 03:24 AM
Response to Original message
14. Like he gives a shit
I'm sure he didn't read the (Un)Patriot act either. He damn sure hopped up to sign that piece of shit legislation.

Regards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 03:37 AM
Response to Original message
15. So, Boehner doesn't know anything about what he's against.
Figures. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 04:03 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. LOL!! Do those goons know anything??..nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
16. What is the word I am looking for...Oh, BULLSHIT..
Edited on Sat Feb-14-09 04:05 AM by and-justice-for-all
Bone'r and McFuckwad II can suck it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
18. The only thing he is right about- now what is the total number of bills he read last year?
Edited on Sat Feb-14-09 06:54 AM by JCMach1
answer= 0

Besides, that's what staffers are for...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBigotBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
19. Does that include him?
Edited on Sat Feb-14-09 06:58 AM by TheBigotBasher
Does that mean he is not doing his job? How does he know it is a "pork bill" then?

Another example of Republican stupidity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Exactly. Nor did the....
... gaggle of whining GOP Reps behind him who followed up by saying "I didn't get my way! WAH WAH WAH!!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
20. Two things:
1. Does that mean Boener and other republicans deferred, refused, or just decided not to read the bill on a willful basis?

2. Nobody read the PATRIOT ACT as it was shoved up Congress' ass and its passage demanded within 24 hours. Nobody was talking debate for THAT emergency legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
23. I'll wager that Kucinich read it n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
24. What he doesn't say: They NEVER do. They read summaries & get info from staffers, etc.
Bills are hundreds of pages thick, or longer. This stimulus bill is as thick as a book and is written in legalese. And, for instance, if the bill changes ONE PROVISION of an existing statute, the bill may contain the entire statute from the law books, with that one changed provision in it.

If no one read the bill, that means that BOEHNER didn't read it, either. I can promise you that BOEHNER hasn't read ANY of the bills that he ever voted on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
25. Call me crazy, but it seems to me that someone must have read it, if they
have come up with all these provisions that are in it that they are railing against. How do you cite specific examples of what is in a bill that you are against if you haven't read the bill? How do you have specifics about "pork" if you admit you don't even know what is in it?

So either he's lying or the Republics have been obstructionist right out of the box, with no real reason to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
26. They're ignorant!
And proud of it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
27. Speak for yourself, Congressman . . .
Edited on Sat Feb-14-09 09:41 AM by EffieBlack
And, by the way, would you care to share with us how many bills you read when Republicans were in control?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
28. If no repubic read it then how did they manage to strip the money for
Head Start, food for the poor, money for the infrastructure, and all those things that would help the American public out of it? And how did all those tax cuts for the rich get in?

Who did that then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
30. I was especially enamored of his definition of pork:
The proposed high-speed maglev train from LA to Vegas is pork because aparently it doesn't help in any way shape or form create jobs in HIS district...

he actually said that yesterday...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
31. Did Boehner care about how many people
didn't read The Patriot Act before it was (nearly) unanimously passed and quickly sent to Bush post-9/11? :shrug:

Didn't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mudoria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
32. That's what their staffers are for..
put 'em to work. Not like the majority of either parties Senators read 75% of what they vote on anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
33. Grandstanding...
we all know that only Democrats can read.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherish44 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. Wow Boner is quite the little drama queen
See him slam the bill down on the floor? As your party leader Boner, you need read that puppy. Get busy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
37. So that includes him, too
Moran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
38. Boner, you're irrelevant. STFU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
39. So how does he know what's in it?
What part of the bill, which he didn't read, did he object to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeamJordan23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
40. sadly, the MSM picked this up. I saw it discussed on CNN yesterday. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
42. Hey, they can neatly stack the stimulus cash, climb up, and ask the sky fairy for a loan. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
43. That performance by Boner was just that, a performance. I'm sure he and his staff and many other
pukes are/were well aware of what was in that bill. I'm sure they had an idea that certain things were slipped in, like Dodd's pay limitations and other things they will surely find unacceptable. It is nothing more than dramatic posturing to further highlight the puke points of contention they feel they have regarding their exclusion from the process. All a complete load of crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
44. Right. The way Republicans always read every piece of crap sent to them
by Karl Rove. Like the one about Iraq and 9/11, Iraq and WMD?

All the "tax cuts" while the country was bleeding.

Sheer chutzpah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
45. Oh please.
They've had 95% of the bill for weeks. The senate version passed on the 10th, the house revisions (a measly 6 pages) were available on the 11th. So at a minimum they had 48 hours to "read" the bill.

Why hasnt anyone asked how they were able to read, research, and come out against the first draft of the bill less than 24 hours after they got it but werent able to research a miniscule percentage of the bill that was new in 48 to 72 hours?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
47. This excuse always cracks me up.
Has anyone ever seen a PDF of a bill? It's in huge type, double-spaced with huge margins. It's takes at the less than a minute to read each page. It's possible to read an 1,100 page bill in one night or over a couple of nights. Here is an example of the amount of text on a full page:

1 funded: Provided further, That priority for awarding such
2 funds shall be given to activities that can commence
3 promptly following approval: Provided further, That the
4 Department shall submit a report on planned spending and
5 actual obligations describing the use of these funds not later
6 than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, and
7 quarterly thereafter until all funds are obligated, to the
8 Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representa9
tives and the Senate.
10 SEC. 102. NUTRITION FOR ECONOMIC RECOVERY.
11 (a) MAXIMUM BENEFIT INCREASES.—
12 (1) ECONOMIC RECOVERY 1-MONTH BEGINNING
13 STIMULUS PAYMENT.—For the first month that begins
14 not less than 25 days after the date of enactment of
15 this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture (referred to in
16 this section as the ‘‘Secretary’’) shall increase the cost
17 of the thrifty food plan for purposes of section 8(a)
18 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C.
19 2017(a)) by 85 percent.
20 (2) REMAINDER OF FISCAL YEAR 2009.—Begin21
ning with the second month that begins not less than
22 25 days after the date of enactment of this Act, and
23 for each subsequent month through the month ending
24 September 30, 2009, the Secretary shall increase the
25 cost of the thrifty food plan for purposes of section



There is no excuse for not reading a bill when the core text has been available for weeks.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
48. What BS
I had to read a good 20% of the earlier Senate version for work to do an analysis of what my state agency could do with the money. Legislators on the whole are lazy, and a lot of them are just stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC