Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republicans start to support the idea of nationalizing insolvent banks by Nouriel Roubini

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 12:00 PM
Original message
Republicans start to support the idea of nationalizing insolvent banks by Nouriel Roubini
Republicans start to support the idea of nationalizing insolvent banks
by Nouriel Roubini
February 15, 2009

George Stephanopoulos cited twice the Washington Post op-ed - that Matt Richardson and I wrote in support of nationalizing insolvent banks - in his Sunday "ABC’s “This Week" program and asked his four program guests if they supported the idea of bank nationalization. While the Democrats Maxine Waters and Charles Schumer were a bit formally cautious in formally supporting this idea – lest of being accused of being Bolsheviks - the Republican Senator Lindsey Graham – a conservative from South Carolina - would not rule out the idea of nationalizing insolvent banks. As Graham put it in the ABC program…:

"This idea of nationalizing banks is not comfortable," said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC). "But I think we've got so many toxic assets spread throughout the banking and financial community, throughout the world, that we're going to have to do something that no one ever envisioned a year ago, no one likes. To me, banking and housing are the root cause of this problem. I'm very much afraid any program to salvage the banks is going to require the government... I would not take off the idea of nationalizing the banks."

And while President Obama repeated again his arguments that the Swedish model of nationalizing the banks – as opposed to the Japanese approach of keeping zombie banks alive – was not appropriate for the U.S. he did not totally rule out – when probed twice in an interview with the Washington Post’s E.J. Dionne – the possibility that a government takeover of some insolvent institutions may eventually take place.

This is really breath-taking, that even free-market economists are talking about the federal government taking over the nation's largest banks. I'm not sure which is more mind-bending, the thought of an African American in the White House or Citigroup becoming part of the Executive Branch. Bank of America would truly be living up to its name then.

What's even more astonishing is for a Republican from South Carolina, not Maine mind you, but the Palmetto State, a conservative like Sen. Lindsey Graham, to say that nationalization needs to be something to consider. And he wasn't alone. Rep. Peter King of New York also allowed for this possibility.

Please read the complete article at:

http://www.rgemonitor.com/roubini-monitor/255573/republicans_start_to_support_the_idea_of_nationalizing_insolvent_banks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. lip-sync milli-vanilli style support
as soon as the administration moves in that direction (and they will be forced to do so) the Republic Party will Greek Chorus "Socialismic!" "Communismalist!" blather, ably assisted by Corporate Media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Exactly which banks are we talking about here?
Roubini advocates nationalizing large banks that are insolvent.

Which large banks are considered insolvent? Wells? BofA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I think the answer is 'all of them' but ...
part of the problem is that the fed and other agencies are not being forthcoming about just who is insolvent and how insolvent they might be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That's what the "stress test" is designed to find out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. We had a 'stress test'
Every last one of the large banks failed it and came to Uncle Sam for a handout. The stress test has been failed - none of them are adequately capitalized, and the US cannot borrow enough money to correct that situation.

They are ALL insolvent. Any pretense otherwise is a result of cooking the books. If you or I tried on our balance sheets (aka tax returns) the kind of accounting tricks that are routine in corporate America right now, we'd be on a one-way trip to fraud conviction city. The only banks that aren't insolvent are relatively small ones that kept an adequate capitalization ratio, lent responsibly, and stayed out of the default-prone sectors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
biopowertoday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. I believe they were talking of the ones holding the toxic assets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Brad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-17-09 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. And what happens to all their employees if that happens?
The overwhelming majority of bank employees are white collar working stiffs who have never reaped the huge profits of the executives. Who manages the banks that get taken over?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Veritas_et_Aequitas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. They'll backpedal when nationalization becomes a serious issue.
How many of us have been crying for nationalization since October? I hope it comes to pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. They have an ulterior motive here
But what is it?

Lindsey Graham wouldn't be bringing this scheme up if there wasn't a hidden agenda. They are GOP and do nothing unless there is political gain or profit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Let's test the Republicans and Democrats! Bring a nationalization bill before Congress!
Let's find out which Senators want to save the financial system and which ones are opposed to nationalizing the insolvent big banks.

There is only one way to do that.

We need an effective nationalization proposal on the floor.

Let President Obama bring a clear proposal to nationalize the big insolvent banks before the House and Senate.

Pelosi and Reid (with co-sponsors) should quickly bring a bill incorporating President Obama's nationalization proposal up for debate and a vote.

Let's debate it and vote on it.

And if any Senators threaten to filibuster against nationalization, let them!

They will be defeated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC