Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

senator-elect al franken's situation is yet more proof that bush v. gore was a crock of partisan shi

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:22 AM
Original message
senator-elect al franken's situation is yet more proof that bush v. gore was a crock of partisan shi
(sorry, ran out of space on the subject line :evilgrin:)


as if we needed more proof, where is scalia and gang rushing in to shut down the process so the people of minnesota can have the representation to which they are constitutionally entited.

one of the many arguments scalia made in his bush v. gore rationalization was that deciding who won the election simply could not wait. there was no time. well in advance of inauguration date, time had simply run out. knowing the victor of an election shortly after the election was somehow vastly more important than actually determining who got more votes.

yet in franken's case, we're now well past the january 3 swearing-in, and minnesotans are still short one seated senator.


yes, i know, there are different election laws, and yes, i know scalia cynically declared in bush v. gore that it's not a precendent for anything (ironically establishing a precedent for handing down precedent-free opinions), and yes, i know all his rationalization were crap designed to vaguely disguise a flagrantly political decision. but this makes it all the more clear that scalia and his gang are partisan operators and not "justices" in any real meaning of the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. The pukes on the Court need to be removed/negated by any means necessary. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. if only obama had the clout to expand and pack the court
but even fdr got in deep doo-doo for trying that....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. The Repugs are going to fight for it until the count comes out right.
Remember, they are well-practiced at that technique. Don't bother them or they'll need to start counting all over again.

We are a country of 2 legal systems. The one "by the people" and the RepublicOn one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
veganlush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. I just sent Al Franken's office twenty-five bucks via

paypal. If everyone sends a little, it could add up...:bounce: www.alfranken.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. geez, I just can't sit back and watch what they trying to do to
Senator Franken, I just gave $25 too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. While I don't disagree with you,
Edited on Thu Feb-19-09 08:15 PM by Occam Bandage
the Supreme Court can't do anything to this process, because nobody's appealed it up to them yet. Heck, nobody's appealed it up to the MN Supreme Court yet, though Coleman probably eventually will after he stretches the current court process out as long as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. this is the big leagues, and there are back channel conversations all the time
if coleman were ahead at this stage one and the supremos were of a mind to stop it should the matter come to the court, word would have gotten from a scalia staffer to a coleman staffer and coleman's lawyers would have found a way to get the matter before scalia and the gang.

in the actual case, the supremos are not going to go all bush v. gore for franken's benefit, so he's left to go through the grinder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. Coleman is getting funds, and having the repigs speaking out for him
he has a commercial out with McConnell, Boehner and someone else who is saying Coleman needs to come back to the Senate.

Oh, I think Senator Franken will need some donations, I will try to scrape up something for him, the whole thing is sick, Franken is the winner. I hate republicans they are really showing what a$$es they truly are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr. Sparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. The Republicans strategy is to hold up a Al's conformation for as long as possible
to keep the democrats from getting closer to filibuster proof majority. I have to be honest and just say words fail me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. the grand obstructionist party at work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC