Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court forces Obama to move quickly in subpoena case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 07:16 PM
Original message
Court forces Obama to move quickly in subpoena case
http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2009/02/dc-circuit-forces-obama-to-move-quickly-in-subpoena-case.html?cid=148972069

Despite the Justice Department's plea for more time, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit today gave the Obama administration one week to determine whether to press ahead with President George W. Bush’s assertion that his former aides are absolutely immune to congressional subpoenas.

U.S. District Judge John Bates rejected the claim last year, after the House of Representatives sued to enforce subpoenas issued to former White House counsel Harriet Miers and chief of staff Joshua Bolten to testify and provide documents related to the firings of nine U.S. attorneys.

The case also implicates former White House adviser Karl Rove. House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-Mich.) has subpoenad Rove’s testimony in connection with the U.S. attorney firings and the prosecution of former Alabama Gov. Don Siegelman.

Facing a Feb. 18 deadline, the Obama administration asked the court for a two-week extension to state its position in the case, but the court today ordered the Justice Department to file its opening brief by Feb. 25. The department immediately filed a motion to reconsider (link not available), emphasizing the need for more time to negotiate an increasingly complex range of interests.

“The inauguration of a new president has altered the dynamics of this case and created new opportunities for compromise rather than litigation,” wrote acting Assistant Attorney General Michael Hertz. "At the same time, there is an additional interested party -- the former President -- whose views should be considered.”

(...)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC