Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Enjoy the quicksand: Palin, Jindal, Barbour, Sanford, Perry about to walk right into it

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 08:23 PM
Original message
Enjoy the quicksand: Palin, Jindal, Barbour, Sanford, Perry about to walk right into it
Edited on Thu Feb-19-09 08:27 PM by zulchzulu
South Carolina's Mark Sanford, Louisiana's Bobby Jindal, Mississippi's Haley Barbour, Alaska's Sarah Palin and Texas' Rick Perry are all apparently aligned to reject the Stimulus Package for their states. Rejecting aid for their infrastructure, ignoring the unemployed and middle fingering thousands of good-paying jobs for their citizens plays second to their political aspirations and ego.

All these states are financially in huge trouble and/or have projected HUGE debts in 2010:

South Carolina:
$871 million

Alaska:
$360 million

Mississippi:
$175 million

Louisiana:
$341 million

Texas:
$3.5 billion

http://www.cbpp.org/9-8-08sfp.htm


It's great that they want to run for President in 2010 and GET THEIR ASS KICKED, but it's tragic that they are willing to not care about their own constituents.

Walk right into the quicksand, assholes.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe instead of the hip hop party they are going to be the hip deep party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. The sheep dip party???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
26. The heap deep party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. i will watch as their constituents march on the gov mansions with pitchforks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Do people actually suport this idiocy outside of the wingnuts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nxylas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
28. Even (non-wingnutty) Republicans I know in SC loathe Sanford
My oncologist is a moderate Republican, but she describes Sanford as a do-nothing governor and can see the craziness of refusing stimulus money when our state's economy is in the shape it's in. And you should hear how Republican state legislators talk about him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. They are counting on the state government to over ride them
so they look tough but the state will get the money anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Naaah, They're just gonna blather about not taking it . . .
Pretend they haven't, and then actually grab every frakkin' nickel they can get their hands on. Alaska is one huge welfare state, and the fact that Texas doesn't dare tax the incomes of the rich means they're always close to the edge of financial ruin. And Louisiana is dying, having never recovered from Katrina.

You'll see some posturing, but when the trough is rolled out, these guys will be elbowing each other to get to the front of the line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
30. You nailed it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. I have a Question
So, if they manage to sucessfuly block this funding from their states, do the rest of the states get to divy it up, or is it neutralized?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. As far as I know, the money is allocated to the states...
The states will probably override the governors anyway, but it certainly will make some interesting political commercials. I know Palin is running for relection and perhaps the others are too... I may find out later.

I have to walk my dog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blaze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. Is there even a procedural way to "reject" the aid?
Is this anything more than a lot of talk and press?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's nice to know that Congress can overrule these morans... Geez. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. Texas 3.5 billion...oh that is just great
Now we will have more Texans coming over for jobs in New Mexico...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. It really shows a lack of responsible judgment
These people act like children and want to play games when there is a need to be serious. It's unfortunate that the citizens of some states have Governors who don't give a care about the condition of their states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soccermomforobama Donating Member (327 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. Perry sent a letter to Pres. Obama accepting funds
President Barack Obama

The White House

Dear Mr. President:

I'm writing you today in response to stipulations set forth in H.R. 1, the $787 billion stimulus package you signed into law yesterday. As you know, I have been vocal in my opposition to this legislation because I believe there are better ways to reinvigorate our economy and believe H.R. 1 will burden future generations with unprecedented levels of debt.

Throughout the years, Texas taxpayers have sent substantially more dollars to Washington than we receive on issues ranging from transportation to border security and hurricane relief. As I have during the debate on H.R. 1, should Congress pass stimulus legislation using Texas tax dollars, I would work to ensure our citizens receive their fair share.

On behalf of the people of Texas, please allow this letter to certify that we will accept the funds in H.R. 1 and use them to promote economic growth and create jobs in a fiscally responsible manner that is in the best interest of Texas taxpayers. I remain opposed to using these funds to expand existing government programs, burdening the state with ongoing expenditures long after the funding has dried up.

I continue to believe the best way to stimulate the economy is the approach we are taking here in Texas. As a result of low taxes, controlled government spending and a predictable regulatory climate, nearly 80 percent of all jobs created in the United States were created in Texas; the vast majority of these were private sector jobs. Just last week, Texas was ranked the top exporting state in the nation for the seventh year in a row.

It was a pleasure meeting you in Philadelphia, and I appreciate your concern for the Texans displaced by Hurricane Ike. While we differ on solutions to the ongoing economic crisis facing our country, I believe we both share a desire to see our great nation endure as a beacon of freedom and economic vitality to the world.

Sincerely,

Rick Perry

Governor

http://www.connectamarillo.com/news/news_story.aspx?id=262497
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Perry is walking back on his original "sadness" about the Stim
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soccermomforobama Donating Member (327 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. Gov. Sanford said this morning he would accept funds also
"I think the problem that was created with too much debt will never be solved by adding yet more debt," he said. "I think there are a number of wrinkles that have caused a number of us to say 'Wait a minute, let's take a long look at whether or not this really makes sense for our state.'"

Still, Sanford said he would accept the funds.

"Being against it doesn't preclude taking the money."

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/02/19/politics/main4812194.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. Its amazing they actually think refusing money helps them against Obama
It may play to their conservative base. But that base is no longer enough to win anything but the South
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
17. Each and every one of them will be taking that money count on it.
They may pretned to be forced to do it butthey will spend it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #17
29. YEP ...liars ..just a big charade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
18. Good, we can use the money
on other important things if these Govs won't accept it, although, I do wish they would to help the people who need it instead of creepy politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
19. I double dog dare Guvna Goodhair to pass on it.
Kay Bailey Hutchison will kick his ass in the next Tx GOP primary for gov. Yeah, she isn't much better, but Perry is a Bush toady.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
20. Sanford is already backtracking and saying he will now take the money.
Losers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
21. So glad Perdue isn't on that list
Georgia really needs the money... especially after Perdue's miserable incompetence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. I'm sure old Saxby tried to talk him out of it.
I didn't know you were in Atlanta! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
36. oh yes... didn't know you were
I thought you were in another country!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #36
44. I am but I was born and raised in the SWATS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
22. ITs all smoke and mirrors. They (the states) will get the money....
and those assholes will be able to dupe their idiot supporters into thinking that they are "doing the right thing".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hay rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
23. Reverse bridge to nowhere.
They're against it before they are for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
25. I'm glad my Governor is'nt a republikkkan..............
here in CO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
27. So let other states take their shares?
I cannot believe that anyone is dumb as these GOP idiots!

Jeeeeeeeeeeeeez, people are on the streets and hungry and these GOP assholes do this????

Unreal....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kashka-Kat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
31. hate to sound callous, but the constituents who vote for these idiots & buy
into the RW propaganda have some explainin to do too.... any truth to "we get the govt we deserve"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Cut us a bit of slack in Louisiana, Jindal wasns't seriously contested
Edited on Fri Feb-20-09 01:26 PM by Hippo_Tron
The "Democrat" was a guy named Walter Boasso who was a Republican until he knew he couldn't win the GOP primary against Jindal so he became a Democrat. The Louisiana Democratic Party conceded that election the minute John Breaux decided not to run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOTV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
33. It's safe for them to do ...
... because state legislatures can accept the money without the governor's approval.

So, the governor can make his principled stand, and his state will get the money anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
34. Texas is the only one on the list that doesn't get a huge return on Fed tax $
Perhaps the gov't should make it a bit more equal, then CA can immediately get a couple of billion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
35. all southern governors, but Palin...
Haley Barbour is the most idiotic, racist out of them all. I'm not surprised these five are bitching...:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
37. As long as the people of each state are FULLY INFORMED about their
governors refusing to help them and the economy!

Let's see what their people then have to say about their governors. :) :) :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
38. This isn't a popular decision by the guv here in Alaska
Here's an editorial from this morning's Anchorage Daily News:

http://www.adn.com/opinion/view/story/696294.html

Gov. Sarah Palin appears to be focusing on the negative in the just-passed federal stimulus law, and that could hurt Alaskans suffering from the effects of the national recession. Rather than embrace the economic benefits that the $787 billion package is expected to bring, Palin embraced wholesale the congressional Republicans' criticism of the law.

The stimulus money is aimed at helping states, local governments and school districts retain jobs, and to create jobs in the private sector.

Palin said in a press release that she's concerned about "integrating" federal stimulus money in the state operating budget -- and increasing programs that might have to be cut when the federal spending boost ends.

It sounds as if she's hyping a hypothetical problem to burnish her conservative national credentials. She governs a state where one-third of the entire economy depends on federal spending. This year's state budget is already bolstered with $2.6 billion of federal money. Tough talk about spurning federal aid is just that -- talk.

The federal stimulus contains $150 billion over the next two and a half years to give state governments a cushion against drastic cuts. If the states slash spending, real people get hurt and the economy sinks further.

For example, the feds are offering to pay $87 billion more nationally for Medicaid, the government health insurance for the poor, right at a time when more people are losing their jobs and will need help.

Yes, the funding will drop after 2010, but so what? The insurance program, which is administered by states, will be there now, when Alaskans most need it.

Alaska's governments are already in trouble. Due to plunging oil revenues, Palin this week announced a $445.5 million reduction from her earlier state budget proposal (and she'll use federal Medicaid stimulus money to help backfill the cuts). In Anchorage, the stock market crisis late last year pushed city government into the red. The Anchorage School District is looking to trim some programs.

The stimulus funding will help Alaskans get through tough times. It boosts unemployment benefits by $25 per week just through this year. It increases child support enforcement funding to prevent cutbacks and help families get the money they need to survive for the next couple of years. It adds to education money available to states and school districts, with a focus on poor, disabled or disadvantaged students.

These increases come in addition to a pile of money set aside in the stimulus law for building and repairing roads and other public facilities, which will provide jobs in private business.

So why is Gov. Palin such a reluctant recipient?

Republican governors who are not angling to run for president in 2012 are happy to get the money for their states. It makes you wonder if her national political ambitions are leading her one way, when what's best for Alaska leads another.

Instead of casting such a wary eye on the federal help, Gov. Palin would serve the state better by figuring out how to make the federal stimulus funds deliver the maximum possible benefit for Alaskans.


BOTTOM LINE: Gov. Palin shouldn't take a partisan approach to using federal stimulus funding.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Palin seriously doesn't have a clue how her own state runs...
Her sputtering that "integrating" federal stimulus money in the state operating budget where a third of the state money is from federal coffers is an absolute JOKE.

She's part of the "Be Dumb Like Me" crowd. No thanks...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. What's very sad
is that there appear to be a lot of commenters who agree with her. The irony is that the Republicans here were all apoplectic about Ted Stevens not being our senator anymore because he could always bring home the federal dollars. I guess Republican federal dollars are so much more acceptable than Democratic federal dollars. Idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Dupe - twitchy fingers
Edited on Fri Feb-20-09 05:41 PM by Blue_In_AK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
39. I only had time to read one post today.. glad this one was it ! K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
41. Kind of gives new meaning to the term "red state" doesn't it?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShadowLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
45. What's really ironic is their states will still pay for it in taxes anyway in the long run
What's really stupid about rejecting the stimulus money is in the long run when taxes go up to pay for it (as they claim will happen) their state will owe just as much in taxes to pay for the stimulus as they would have if they accepted it all.

That means that their state gets to suffer even more from the recession, AND pay for the stimulus that they didn't receive because their governor wanted to run for president. What a great system, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
46. I feel badly for the Democrats in those states, but I hope the Repukes suffer horribly.
They put these people in power; they can reap what they've sown.

Red state Democrats ... I'm sorry. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC