Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This is a fascinating choice...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 11:00 PM
Original message
This is a fascinating choice...
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2009/02/harvard_expert.html

Harvard expert nominated for key Pentagon post

By Bryan Bender, Globe Staff

WASHINGTON -- President Obama late this afternoon nominated Harvard professor Ashton B. Carter, a leading authority on arms control, to take on a surprising new role, according to top administration officials -- as the Pentagon's chief weapons buyer.

The choice of Carter to run the office that oversees hundreds of billions of dollars for new weapons and research -- and the focus of intense lobbying by defense firms, retired generals, and members of Congress -- has been rumored for weeks. And word of his pending nomination has already sparked concern within the defense industry and some of the Pentagon bureaucracy.

But that may be exactly what Obama and Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates want.

Unlike most of his predecessors selected to be under secretary of defense for acquisition, technology and logistics, Carter has no professional ties to America's arms makers or manufacturing industry, nor has he spent his career in government procurement. Instead, from his perch at Harvard's Kennedy School, Carter has been criticizing the Pentagon for buying too many armaments it doesn't need, decrying what he calls a lack of discipline and "failure to take account of cost growth in weapons systems and defense services."

A trained scientist with a doctorate in theoretical physics and a degree in Medieval history, Carter's advocates say the long-time Harvard professor and national security specialist is being chosen because his combination of technical expertise and knowledge of defense strategy will be needed to make what Gates calls "difficult choices" about which weapons programs to invest in and which ones to terminate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is the most awesome thing I read today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Any fresh and untainted blood we can get into the Pentagon is a good thing.
Sounds like an interesting gentleman with some very good past criticism of the weapons buying habits of the past. Will look forward to more info on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. His background in reducing nuclear weapons is attractive
probably was to Obama too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BanzaiBonnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-23-09 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Did I tell you I love this president?
I keep saying it. My husband has heard me say it about a bajillion times. And I'm going to keep saying it. I'll never get tired of it.


Obama is the real deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
givemebackmycountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. THIS will be interesting....
The first time the words "defense" and "cuts" enter the American Lexicon the Right Wingers will lose their mind.

They will accuse Obama of every chicken shit, soft on whatever crap they can scream or write about.
I can't wait.
I think America is sick of trillion dollar Aircraft carriers and 22 billion dollar fighter jets that we don't need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Booth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. Why doesn't Obama appoint any progressives?1??
Oh, wait. Nevermind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
7. This IS Change!
Where are the 25 threads on this? I don't see them, and I know I wouldn't hide them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
8. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Undercurrent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
9. Happy dance!
But I gotta tell you folks, I'm not surprised. So far, our President has done things he wrote and talked about for a long time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
10. Excellent! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. Trimming The Bloated Pentagon Budget and Spending On Useless Over-Priced Crap Can Save HUNDREDS OF
Edited on Tue Feb-24-09 02:42 PM by Beetwasher
BILLIONS OF DOLLARS that can be better used elsewhere.

This is an AWESOME pick by Obama and I suspect there will be both hatchet and scalpel used on the Pentagon's disgustingly bloated budget, as well as SIGNIFICANT oversight (which has been absent for DECADES!!) on their spending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. KICK!!!!! For The Obama Bashers!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. If he's able to take out even a fraction of the bloat in the Defense budget,
it would be a HUGE improvement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC