Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BREAKING: Obama Restores Rule of Law For Detainee

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 04:50 PM
Original message
BREAKING: Obama Restores Rule of Law For Detainee

BREAKING: Obama Restores Rule of Law For Detainee

by overruled

The ACLU just announced that Ali Saleh Kahlah al-Marri, the only Bush-era "enemy combatant" being held in military detention on U.S. soil, will be charged as a criminal terrorist and tried for his alleged crimes by the Obama Administration. This is a really big deal, both because it marks a major step by the new Administration to demonstrate that national security does not require us to abandon the Constitution, and also because it gives meaning to President Obama’s previous decision to close Gitmo. If the Gitmo detainees were merely transferred from Cuba to U.S. soil, but were then detained here without trail, the President’s promise to close Gitmo would have been meaningless.

The Supreme Court already agreed to consider a challenge to the constitutionality of al-Marri’s detention, and the ACLU is asking the Court still to consider that case. According to Al-Marri’s attorney, the ACLU’s Jonathan Hafetz, "it is vital that the Supreme Court case go forward because it must be made clear once and for all that indefinite military detention of persons arrested in the U.S. is illegal and that this will never happen again."

I couldn’t agree more.

<…>

One question that came up in comments is whether al-Marri has been charged yet. My understanding is that the Administration is still preparing the case, and hasn't filed charges yet.

Even so, I wouldn't read that much into this delay. Preparing a prosecution always takes time, and it is perfectly reasonable for the new Attorney General to take an appropriate amount of time to get it right. If, in fact, al-Marri is a terrorist, then we want his trial to lead to conviction.

What is important is that the Obama Administration is following the constitutionally correct process of investigation, charging and trial---not Bush's extra-legal process of never-ending detentions.


Prosecutors Prepare Charges Against Final 'Enemy Combatant' in U.S.

By Carrie Johnson and Julie Tate
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, February 26, 2009; 3:00 PM

<...>

Indicting Marri in a federal court marks a significant change from the policies of the Bush administration, which had argued that al-Marri should be tried in a military tribunal proceeding and that he could not use American courts to contest his legal status.

Marri is the last remaining "enemy combatant" in the United States and has spent 5 1/2 years in a military brig in South Carolina. The criminal charges, which sources said also could include conspiracy, will be among the most early and critical signals about the Obama administration's approach to handling alleged terrorism suspects.

In one of his first steps since taking office last month, President Obama explicitly directed government lawyers to review the status of Marri's case. He also ordered within one year the closure of the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where about 245 terrorism suspects have been housed for years.

The decision to move Marri into the U.S. courts, where he will be able to assert a host of rights to challenge any evidence against him, comes after lengthy debate at the highest levels of government.

more





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. An encouraging sign. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. The Rule of Law and
logic..brilliant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AyanEva Donating Member (428 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. good stuff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yes it is. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. CHECK 1. To complaints against Obama on this.
Edited on Thu Feb-26-09 05:12 PM by vaberella
I believe Rachel Maddow was another person who was "worried." We need to send this to her. Well I will, but we need others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. She's always worried. n/t
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EraOfResponsibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. lol yep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EraOfResponsibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-26-09 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. kick and rec'd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-09 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
9. Good in that case.
I still wish the victims of torture could have had their day in court against Jeppesen Dataplan. But this is a good start as Marri was indefinitely held without formal charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC