Drunken Irishman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-28-09 12:43 AM
Original message |
Wait, wait, wait...Bobby Jindal was in congress for two years, right? |
|
Edited on Sat Feb-28-09 12:44 AM by Drunken Irishman
Yet when Bush was putting forth his budget in 2005 and 2006, years Jindal was in the congress, why didn't he object?
If he was so opposed to spending, how could he support those budgets? Better yet, how can he now rebuke the spending under Bush when he sat idly by and allowed it?
|
Rosa Luxemburg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-28-09 12:45 AM
Response to Original message |
DJ13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-28-09 12:55 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Object?! He was the King of earmarks! |
|
Someone posted a link here yesterday that showed he had gotten over $94m in earmarks passed in those two years.
|
elleng
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-28-09 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. THAT is a good piece of info; |
|
along with 'he lied,' I think we know the rest about him.
|
Hamlette
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Feb-28-09 01:21 AM
Response to Original message |
4. I read that he supported Bush in his votes 100% |
|
but people who are not defending him say "we can't go back in the time machine" (ha ha) what is past is past.
Idiots.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:37 AM
Response to Original message |