Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mittens picked as 2012 GOPiggie front-runner, wins straw poll. Jindal 2nd. Phalin tied for third.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 05:46 PM
Original message
Mittens picked as 2012 GOPiggie front-runner, wins straw poll. Jindal 2nd. Phalin tied for third.
Romney picked as 2012 GOP front-runner

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Conservative activists on Saturday named former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney the winner of a poll for best 2012 GOP presidential candidate.

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney won 20 percent of the vote in straw poll for presidential favorites. The poll marked the third consecutive year Romney came out on top.

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal placed second in the annual poll, conducted at the Conservative Political Action Conference.

Romney received 20 percent of the vote and Jindal got 14 percent.

Close behind were Texas Rep. Ron Paul and Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, who each received 13 percent of the vote.

The results were culled over two days from 1,757 of the party activists who came to Washington for the annual conference and filled out ballots on Thursday and Friday. Nearly 60 percent of the straw poll participants were between the ages of 18 and 25. More than half of the conference attendees this year were college students.

The choices in the poll were: Florida Gov. Charlie Crist; former House speaker Newt Gingrich; former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani; former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee; Jindal; Paul; Palin; Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty; Romney; South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford, and "Undecided." There was also space on the ballot for a write-in candidate.

<SNIP>

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/02/28/cpac/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. So Romney won the last two years and where did it get him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrModerate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. I have to agree with them . . . for all his baggage, Romney is . . .
The most electable of the whole bunch. He can simulate statesmanship and makes fewer bug-ass crazy remarks than most of that crew. Obama would wipe the floor with him, of course, but at least it'd kinda look like a contest.

And if the world goes entirely to hell, Obama'll get blamed and Romney would be even more viable under such a scenario.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Republicans really hate Romney though. I mean from what I heard he less fans than Paul. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ocracoker16 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. He is not popular with conservatives
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Every Man A King Donating Member (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thank you for the context n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Judging by the game-changing effect the '07 and '08 polls had on the '08 race,
I think it's pretty obvious that the '09 poll makes him nothing short of a lock for '12.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Medusa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. They got nothing
LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Exactly!
They had nothing in 2008 and I believe they know they have nothing for 2012. They don't know what to do about it though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. I luv that!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. Romney is a slick snake oil business man type but at the very least
he can give a halfway decent speech and is not a space cadet. Considering what the Repubs have to choose from I would say the pickins are indeed slim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pettypace Donating Member (695 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-28-09 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. Mitt Romney will be an excellent candidate
Could it have been his Mormonism that prevented his nomination last year? He seemed like a great candidate, and would have shined post Lehman Bros meltdown.

Lets see if the religious conservatives will give him some slack and give the nod to him for '12.

I'd say a Romney/Rick Perry ticket would fit the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
12. Had the GOPers been smart and less prejudiced against Mormons, they
would have made Romney their nominee in '08, seeing as how the economy was his strong suit. But he just couldn't get away from the Massachusetts-liberal stain and the "not a Christian" thing--plus, he's not very likeable. The media actually selected McCain--conservative GOPers never liked or trusted him, but at least he didn't sport magic underwear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Romney is such a bad politician
Edited on Sun Mar-01-09 12:02 PM by Wetzelbill
the race probably was his for the taking. They maybe could have gotten over the prejudice thing if they had to, but by being so unlikeable and inauthentic he shot himself in the foot. It was embarrassing watching that guy change every position he's ever had. He was so terrible on the campaign trail and so inauthentic in debates and interviews that he totally blew his chance at winning. Only Rudy and Fred Thompson were worse. Rudy was epically bad, that collapse is legendary. Nobody really compares to that, not even Mitt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yes, how quickly people forget the colossal fail that was Rudy--
notice he's not even on the radar anymore--there was no way a pro-choice GOPer was going to get anywhere NEAR the throne. Mittens had brains, but just didn't have the political skill, you're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. if Mitt had the natural political skill of Mike Huckabee
Then he might be able to go somewhere nationally, but he don't. He comes off as a sleazy car salesman and when he isn't coming off like that he seems like the asshole boss who just fired a few hundred employees. Plus, he has a bit of a creepy aura about him, that's probably unfair, but he does. Romney is th sort of guy who makes people uneasy, and you know he might very well be a nice guy but he comes off that way a little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
13. right now all the panning helps Jindal with the GOP
They are so resentful about the media and they always feel people are looking down on them that even though they probably thought his speech sucked, they also have an identification with him for the perception of him being made fun of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocracyInaction Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
14. Okay-now I know they were smoking dope at the CPAC
What's wrong with this crazy bat-ass scene? Here are the biggest collection of right-wing fanatics, lunatics, terrorists, traitors and nut jobs on the planet (lead by Oxy Uncle Rush)and they come up with Mitt who all of them detest 'cause he's "one of them non-Christian Mormons", he's really a Dem ('cause he was in that luberal state of MA), etc. Now days the party is DEFINITELY just all right-wing nut cases and they think Mitt will lead them out of the Wilderness. It's like us picking Lieberman.......I tell you, these people are "on" something...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
18. Even if the economy takes a full turn around
a former CEO isn't going to be a great thing to sell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-01-09 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
19. Wheee! Free Republic just gets more and more entertaining!
This thread quickly degenerates into a free-for-all between Romney haters, Mormon haters, Bobby Jindal birthers and the omnipresent Palin groupies. I had no idea there were Bobby Jindal birthers. Apparently they know that the Founding Fathers' intent with the term "natural born citizen" is that the parents had to have become citizens, which Jindal's weren't yet at the time of his birth. Gosh, I wish I could read the minds of people that have been dead for a couple hundred years.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2196348/posts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC