Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Third Top Treasury Pick Withdraws From Consideration

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 03:01 PM
Original message
Third Top Treasury Pick Withdraws From Consideration
Third Top Treasury Pick Withdraws From Consideration

March 12, 2009 2:31 PM


Democratic sources say that H. Rodgin Cohen, a partner in the New York law firm Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, and the leading candidate for Deputy Treasury Secretary, has withdrawn from consideration.

It's the third withdrawal of a top Treasury Department staff pick in less than a week.
I reported last week that Cohen was likely to be officially nominated for the Deputy Treasury Secretary position.

Cohen has been a counsel to just about every major player on Wall Street, which perhaps complicated his nomination.

Now, the nomination is off.

more...

http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2009/03/another-top-tre.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. NOBODY wants to be associated with this mess.
There are only two options:

1) They'll make changes that will work but will hurt a lot in the short term...and people will bitch.

2) They'll make little changes that won't work and will hurt a little...and people will bitch....and they won't work.


With the "recovery plan" we have so far, we're firmly in the #2 rut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. That has nothing to do with it; it's the vetting process that's so
messed up. I guess you can't have an experienced person in there w/o them having a history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I consider this a good thing. The last two candiates for this position weren't good choices. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It's not real great when someone from another country calls
the Treasury Dept. with a question and there's no one qualified to answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I'd rather noone be there than someone with ethical problems being there for a long time. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Maybe someone fresh out of college will be next. At least their
record might be clean, though I'd be a bit concerned about their lack of experience. It's a quandary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. So there are NO qualified candidates without disqualifying skeletons?
I don't buy it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
masuki bance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is frustrating
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. looks like the crooks have conflicted out most of the more brilliant candidate to clean up the mess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFLforever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. These people take big pay cuts to work at Treasury
which has to diminish the number of qualified applicants as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. Because people want to play this 'Gotcha' bullshit with Obama
Edited on Thu Mar-12-09 05:45 PM by Thrill
Looking for any little thing to turn into a negative story about him. This is hurting him with good qualified people who want to work for him. They pretty much have to be squeaky clean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-12-09 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Yep.
Thats exactly whats happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC