Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

People calling for Geithner's head are now completely missing the mark.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 11:06 PM
Original message
People calling for Geithner's head are now completely missing the mark.
Edited on Fri Mar-20-09 11:14 PM by ProSense
Geithner was confirmed January 26. People have been making noise for weeks. Obama stood by him this week.

Make Geithner and Bernanke Say "Housing Bubble"

By Dean Baker - March 20, 2009, 11:04PM

Timothy Geithner and Ben Bernanke could not see an $8 trillion housing bubble as it was growing to ever more dangerous levels. Remarkably, it seems like they still cannot see the housing bubble even as its collapse is leading to the most severe downturn since the Great Depression.

At least that is what the NYT is telling readers. According to the NYT, the new bank rescue plan works on the assumption that: "because the government can hold those mortgages as long as it wants, officials are betting the government will be repaid and that taxpayers may even earn a profit if the market value of the loans climbs in the years to come."

House prices have another 20 percent to fall to correct back to trend levels. Unless someone is smoking something illegal, they have zero reason to believe they will rise again.

This is painful.


Everyone has an opinion, but the U.S. has only one President. The plan will be unveiled next week.

It should be clear by now that Geithner is not the President, and unless or until Obama says otherwise, Geithner isn't going anywhere.

It'll be interesting if the Obama administration's plan actually works, and I doubt Obama is setting himself up for failure, despite the naysayers.

We'll see.







Edited to add link and typo.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. You assume they're aiming at a certain mark. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Look the plan will either make or break Geithner. I hope it works
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. He's not going anywhere. The President made that clear again
last night. There is no easy fix for these banking issues. Anybody can sit back and write their opinion piece blasting the administration. That's real easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Well, then, we are fucked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Geithner's plan to bailout financial industry shareholders and bondholders *will* fail. It misses
the entire point of fixing the economy and rewards and promotes failure. FIRE HIM, NOW. Before he enacts this BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Obama isn't going to fire him. Obama approves the plan.
What now?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 03:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. What now? It won't work. Obama cannot bailout stockholders and bondholders and expect the nation to
rebound. Obama needs to bailout MAIN STREET. Forget about bailing out stockholders and bondholders. Stocks and bonds are inherently risks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cooolandrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yeah it's probably too early to call resignation when many a Republican should of vacted years >
Edited on Fri Mar-20-09 11:48 PM by cooolandrew
before now with a long list of crimes to their name. Not that any real crimes were committed here anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. And who exactly will run Treasury after Tim G. gets canned? There is no one there right now other
then Geithner. A terrible time to fire the treasury sec would be right now with no staff in place. There would be zero confidence then instead of just a little. I would give him a year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 03:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. We have months. We don't have a year. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 04:16 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Paulson could come back, or Robert Rubin. Maybe Phil Gramm. LOTS of available talent.
Maybe someone from Goldman Sachs. There are a lot of ex-Merrill people who would do a fine job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 05:02 AM
Response to Original message
11. I don't agree with the calls for resignation over bonuses.
But I do believe that Tim G. and the administration mishandled a great many thing when it comes to wall street firms and bailout money and conditions on that money. The dropped the ball. They must pick it up again.

Having said that, I grow sicker and sicker over what I feel was a very poor choice of an economic team. But I don't believe that somehow canning them all now would do anything but send our economy into an even greater tailspin. What we need is to continue to apply counter pressure to our President to match the voices of the corporatist that surround him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-21-09 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. If Geithner quits or is fired won't that mean NOBODY works in Treasury
As I understand it he has no one as yet hired as assistants or deputies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC