Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We are becoming Them

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cleveramerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 04:58 AM
Original message
We are becoming Them
when thoughtful calls for more deliberation, while we assume a generation of debt, are met with"Your just a republican",
It comes across as no different than the ole "You just hate America"


Any body who thinks the members of this party should shut up and get in line, because we won, is a fool.
This is the EXACT line we've heard from the other party for the past 8 years.
Not the change many of us were hoping for.
Power for its own sake is 100% corrupting.
A fool who thinks like a child and has no understanding of how politics actually works is no help to us.


No member of congress should stop representing their constituents, because we won, they should re-double their efforts.
No member of this party should stop speaking their mind, because we won, they should speak up even more.


I still support the President, but not blindly.
there is still hope at this address
There is also cynicism and sarcasm.
And Fear.

That part hasn't changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 04:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. thank you
I know a man as intelligent as Obama would find blind devotion disturbing too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 05:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Great. Another one who's vote means more than
anybody else's. What would we ever do without your vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 05:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. fucking sad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CANDO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. Snarky-assed replies such as yours is what this place needs more of!
Edited on Mon Mar-30-09 04:58 PM by CANDO
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 05:11 AM
Response to Original message
4. "....And has no understanding of how politics actually works is no help to us."
And in there lies the problem with many people here. They are idealists, and not realists. They dont take politics into account when addressing an issue like the legalization of Marijuana. Instead they see Obama as a coward for not taking up an issue that has zero chance in Congress.

It amazes me that the crowd that is accused of blindly following the "hope and change" man, seems to actually grasp that you cant just simply toss politics aside, thats not how things work or will ever work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. Spin away, that does not make it true
No one I have read here expected Obama to 'take up the issue' of legalization. That is for Congress, not the President anyway.
What ticked people off was his snarky attitude, making light of a serious and highly organized set of issues, and utterly rewritting the question he was asked in order to make it fit his rude reply. The man asked for questions, then mocked people for asking, and that is just not nice, not civil, and in this case it showed how out of date his thinking is.
But you can pretend folks are saying otherwise, just as Obama rewrote the question, you can rewrite the discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. it's not the understanding of how politics actually works
it was the manner in which Obama "addressed" the issue, IMO, that pissed a lot of people off.

He didn't just say no, he rather scornfully laughed the whole idea off...

He didn't leave much room for hope on the issue, or change, for that matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. If you don't understand Keynsian Economic theory
Edited on Mon Mar-30-09 05:15 AM by AllentownJake
and understand the role its played in the party's history. I question why you are in this party.

I'll stand by that. Bayh won Indiana 60-40 in 2004! The man is in no electoral danger he's a self interested twit and always has been. A legacy Senator whose father had more courage in his damn pinkie than Evan has in his entire body.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cleveramerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. the times(and the party), they are a changin'
your here for the Keynsian Economic Theory?

brakes are important, for cars and for political parties.
what does your theory say about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I say that I will not be giving one dollar to the democratic party
Edited on Mon Mar-30-09 05:29 AM by AllentownJake
ever again. I'll fund individual candidates and I encourage others to do so. I don't want one cent of my money going to any of these conservadems.

I'm a follower of Krugman and now isn't the time for brakes. If I wanted brakes I'd have voted for someone else in the primary.

What Evan Bayh is doing is putting on the brakes right before we jump over 20 buses. I have never respected the man and never will and I'm ashamed that I voted for him in 2004.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cleveramerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. you voted for guy you never respected?


There is a time when you shouldn't jump them buses. You should go around the track one more time to get everything just right before risking your life for a dream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 05:41 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Correct my analogy
We are jumping the buses while being chased by a gang of pirates. If we don't jump the buses the Pirates will eat us alive.

Right now our healthcare system, energy industry, and taxes on the middle class are a mess. What does Evan Bayh attack in the budget...oh everything Obama campaigned on.

BTW Good old Evan Bayh also stood against renegotiating people's mortgages so that they are easier to pay. I'm thinking all of his campaign contributions from Financial Services (there is a giant industry in financial services in Indiana :sarcasm:) had something to do with that. The man represents big business. He's not that bright and I wish nothing but the worse for him politically.


I held my nose and voted for the democrat. Won't be doing that again if given the choice of a conservadem who gives the republicans cover and a real republican. I'll write in my Dad's name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Just as an FYI
http://firedoglake.com/2009/03/25/evan-bayh-building-bridges-to-nowhere/

Here is some research on Evan.

He represents his campaign contributors and the companies his wife sits on boards for not the state of Indiana.

He represents the worse in the senate and the party. I hope he loses re-election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
11. I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
12. I've not sensed that Obama wants to be followed blindly.

In fact, the tendency of some to do so is probably another touchy item that his administration faces.

Curious, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
empyreanisles Donating Member (313 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. He certainly didn't expect to lose all his support in 2 months, that's for sure.
How many times did he say the "road will be long..." and that there will be "missteps".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. He's lost all his support? That's odd, since he's consistently polling at close to 70% approval.
Don't confuse DU with the world, or even the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
13. There needs to be a paradigm shift in political thinking.


We are all in this mess together and it needs to be fixed.
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
17. The idiots who vow to vote 3d party because of Wagoner
are not advocating issues. They are whiny brats who don't give a shit about anything but their ability to complain on the Internet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
18. Ahhhh...we are becoming...Them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
20. One sane person on DU -- I'd given up hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-30-09 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
21. Who's offering thoughtful calls for more deliberation?
There's angry, unfounded declarations of failure, and there's bitter cynicism. I'm not seeing much in the way of "thoughtful."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC