Shouldn't this thread now be locked?

[Bicoastal]

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=8309290&mesg_id=8309290

[JuniperLea]

1. Yes... but that's not to say...

The multitude of celebratory threads should cease to be.

The thread in question needs to fulfill its destiny.

[ZombieHorde]

2. If people are enjoying the thread, and the thread is not a flame war,

then I see no reason to lock it.

I have not read the thread, other than the OP, so I admit I don't know very much about.

[rvablue]

3. Dunno. After what the Senator went through, it would kind of be a hoot to keep it kicked until

he's re-elected and resworn in in 2016! :patriot:

[Perky]

10. Nooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!

[Buzz Clik]

4. ibtl

[MrSlayer]

5. No. Just don't kick it anymore.

Senator Franken is seated.

[elocs]

6. I don't know. I'm ignoring the author, so maybe it should be locked.

But if I can't see it, then it doesn't matter to me. I would err on the side of not being lock-happy.

[ieoeja]

7. It's several months old thread, has over a thousand posts and is titled, "keep this kicked...

... til Franken is seated".

Hence the option to lock it with "all pomp and circumstance" as a salute to the fact that he finally is.

[jazzjunkysue]

8. I'm torn. What if we just insult it alot and threaten to ignore it, because it didn't affirm my

own opinion?

:shrug:

[asteroid2003QQ47]

9. YES! + K&R

[POAS]

11. I would vote other but

I'm too apathetic.

[Vidar]

12. Send it to the Conspiracy (9-11) Dungeon.