Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama: U.S. not giving Israel green light to attack Iran

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 05:04 PM
Original message
Obama: U.S. not giving Israel green light to attack Iran

Obama: U.S. not giving Israel green light to attack Iran

MOSCOW, Russia (CNN) – The United States is "absolutely not" giving Israel a green light to attack Iran, U.S. President Barack Obama told CNN Tuesday.

"We have said directly to the Israelis that it is important to try and resolve this in an international setting in a way that does not create major conflict in the Middle East," Obama said, referring to Iran's nuclear ambitions.

U.S. Vice President Joe Biden on Sunday appeared to leave the door open for Israel to attack Iran if it saw fit.

"Israel can determine for itself — it's a sovereign nation — what's in their interest and what they decide to do relative to Iran and anyone else," Biden said on ABC's "This Week."

Obama said Tuesday that Biden had simply been stating a fact, not sending a signal.

"I think Vice President Biden stated a categorical fact, which is we can't dictate to other countries what their security interests are. What is also true is that it is the policy of the United States to resolve the issue of Iran's nuclear capabilities in a peaceful way through diplomatic channels," he said.

link


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
masuki bance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. No red light either. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Somebody's gotta clean up this mess.
Edited on Tue Jul-07-09 05:16 PM by Cant trust em
Biden needs to remember that everything he says is going to be played all over the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Some people are not
afraid of facts. Glad Obama expounded.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I mean from Biden's point of view.
Why did he bother to get into that?

I'm going to edit my previous post to better communicate the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. So much for "change," Mr. Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Every time Biden has an interview, they have to clean up behind him
I'm pretty convinced Hillary will be Obama's re-election running mate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. "I'm pretty convinced Hillary will be Obama's re-election running mate." Dumb.
Yeah, he'll have a better time explaining statements about obliterating Iran. Biden's comment was about sovereignty, not destroying a country.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. She would know better not to say certain things while
holding the title of Vice President.

Democrats are going to have to spend time the next two elections defending Biden's comments on the stimulus. They can't wait to put him in their ads.

Don't forget to tell your family not to ride the trains and subways either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Nonsense,
I have no problem with Biden's statement and Obama emphatically reiterated it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. She didn't while a candidate for President and Secretary of state
The fact that she spoke of it being unlikely that we could deal with Iran through negotitations - said when that was the President's policy - pre the election in Iran - is not good.

The difference was that Biden said something in a way where misinterpretation was likely -- HRC was speaking of the President's policy as likely not working. That is worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. You should know better than that.
Hillary responded to a straight forward question of what we would do if Iran attacked Israel with nuclear weapons.

Besides, that was said during the primaries. But of course, you knew that already.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I like them both very much and think they are both where they should be.
Hillary is perfect as SOS and Obama needs someone to tell him like it is as VP. Besides, Joe is Joe and you can't change him and we all know that. Same with Hillary.

Its obvious that both of their answers have been twisted. Stephanopoulos asked Biden what should Israel do if they felt threatened by Iran's nuclear weapons and Hillary was asked a similar question. Israel is a sovereign nation. Obviously, we don't want them to attack Iran tomorrow. It would cause all sorts of problems and Biden already said that in April it would be ill advised. Really, I am tired of people's words getting twisted around to fit the freakout of the day, week, month or year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I don't know that I agree that they are where they should be.
I still would have preferred Hillary to be president now and Obama in the next cycle.

But, it is what it is......

:shrug:

As for Biden, he tends to shoot from the hip a little too much. I like the guy and he's a decent man. Although sometimes he speaks before he seems to remember that he's now the VP and is not representing himself, but giving the administration's position on any issue.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Well, I voted Obama for Prez in the primaries
But I still love ya. :hug:
To me, Hillary being SOS means she does not have to answer all the questions about her ambitions or Bill's interfering like she would as VP so...
And Joe, yeah, he does need to learn that but he is a good guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #15
33. Well, I voted for Hillary in the primaries.
But I like you too.

:pals:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #13
29. It's corporatemediawhores
we have to do away with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Hillary has had her little mistakes as well - and she has rarely
spoken at the level of depth on issues that Biden has - especially on foreign poolicy issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. .
Edited on Wed Jul-08-09 10:49 AM by invictus
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
26. No, she won't..you're forgetting about
all the good Biden does..this is nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
28. You were probably convinced she was running from sniper fire too.
Edited on Wed Jul-08-09 11:07 AM by JTFrog
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #28
35. Not nice............
:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #28
41. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
16. Leave it to Israel to try to drag the US into yet another illegal and immoral war.
Edited on Wed Jul-08-09 10:43 AM by invictus
As if the two we are already fighting are not doing enough harm to this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
18. IMO, Biden's statement was completely intentional
Edited on Wed Jul-08-09 10:49 AM by Hippo_Tron
When you're trying to convince an enemy to disarm and you have a very hawkish ally, it's sometimes a good idea to signal to your enemy that you may or may not be able to keep your ally on the leash.

Obama then of course came in and "cleaned up" after Biden. But as we all know, a gaffe is when a politician accidentally tells the truth. Biden made a "gaffe" in order to send a message to Khamenei.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Israel is incapable of attacking Iran without American help. It would also need America to clean up
its messes as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Israeli leaders stated just a few days ago that they won't even ask the US for help
Edited on Wed Jul-08-09 10:55 AM by Jennicut
for fear they will be turned down. Its not gonna happen, not in the next 4 years anyway. If they need our help, they are not getting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. They can count on us helping them to clean up whether we approve it or not
Allies are sometimes just as much of a menace as enemies. And since they just got approval to use Saudi airspace, it's becoming more and more likely that they can do it without us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #25
31. Israel did NOT get permission to use Saudi airspace.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. More likely than not they did, both sides are of course denying it
Edited on Wed Jul-08-09 11:19 AM by Hippo_Tron
Because King Abdullah certainly doesn't want to be seen as helping the Jews. But I'm sure he has no problem with his airspace being used to drop some bombs on the Persians so long as he can deny that he allowed it.

Either way, somebody leaked that story to send a message to the Iranians and you can bet that they are certainly taking it seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #32
37. That is completely made up. Show me a reliable source. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. Here...
This is an article from when the story first broke

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article6638568.ece

Here's where the Saudis then deny it

http://sev.prnewswire.com/publishing-information-services/20090707/DC4258806072009-1.html

And then here's where the Israelis also deny it

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1097882.html

The fact remains that Saudi Arabia and Iran are adversaries and King Abdullah would likely have little problem with the west weakening an adversary for him. He just can't be seen as coordinating with the Jews.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. It looks like the head of Mossad just made up a lie to try to scare Iran. What a bullshiter!
Edited on Wed Jul-08-09 12:03 PM by invictus
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. Certainly possible, but the Iranians can't be sure if it is a lie or not
Edited on Wed Jul-08-09 12:48 PM by Hippo_Tron
The bottom line is that we're seeing a lot of hawkish signals about the possibility of Israeli strikes as Obama makes overtures to Iran for negotiations. This leads me to believe we're seeing a good cop/bad cop strategy being employed with Obama as the good cop and Netanyahu as the bad cop.

The Saudis letting Israel use their airspace to strike Iran is a serious possibility. Whether or not they actually let them use it doesn't change that fact and that means its something the Iranians have to take into consideration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Iran has no nuclear "arm" to disarm, so that theory you are trying to propagate is BS.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. We don't know whether they are pursuing them or not, we want the inspectors in to find out
BTW, I don't support war with Iran even if they do acquire nuclear weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. True. And Biden did say the US is still open to negotiating with Iran.
IMO, neither Hillary nor Biden ever took the McLame position. He thought it was a joke to bomb Iran. Thankfully, he is not President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. The idea is that Obama presents Iran with an opportunity to negotiate
And Netanyahu provides the ramifications if they are unwilling to negotiate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #18
30. Well, I wasn't quite going the
intentional route but I was thinking..this is all good, anyway.

You may be right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. All of these statements are coordinated to consider both international and domestic politics
Edited on Wed Jul-08-09 11:17 AM by Hippo_Tron
We absolutely use the media to send signals to other nations under the guise that we are using it to communicate with our own public. Obama sanitized the statements so that people here will freak the fuck out less. Biden "the notorious gaffe machine" made the initial comment a lot more blunt so that Khamenei would get the message. I don't use the chess analogy much, but in foreign affairs it's definitely more pertinent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. Better to use
the corporatemedia than to be used by them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
23. So once again..words were read
into what was really said and a brouhaha ensued on corporatemedia and DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
38. Just keep Biden off the Sunday shows
and there won't be any worry about this stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. A large part of the Vice President's job is to be a high level spokesperson for the administration
It's totally unrealistic to keep your Vice President away from the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC