Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Great explanation of Palin on Slate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-09-09 03:00 PM
Original message
Great explanation of Palin on Slate
hat's why the strangest part of the Sarah Palin saga will always be her loathing of the media. She never failed to remind us that she didn't like being "filtered." She only wanted to talk directly to us, her listeners. Yet the reason Sarah Palin continues to have any kind of political force at all in this country is because of the media "filter." The media helped refine and define her Dada statements and arguments into something that briefly sounded like a coherent worldview. Yesterday morning, Gov. Palin excoriated Andrea Mitchell for "not listening to me" in an NBC interview. You have to go back and watch the clip before you can apprehend that Mitchell was indeed listening. It was Palin who was speaking in half-expressed thoughts and internal contradictions.

It's too easy to characterize Sarah Palin as an irrational bundle of bristling grievance. But I think it's more complicated than her simple love for playing the victim all the time. If you think of Palin as someone who never felt herself to be fully heard or understood, not truly politically realized in the eyes of the American public, her rage toward the country, the media, and those of us who fail to love and understand her is easier to comprehend. Think of an American visiting France who believes that if he just speaks louder, he will be speaking French. Palin has done everything in her power to explain herself to us, and still we fail to appreciate what she is all about. I'd be frustrated, too, if I thought I was offering up straight talk and nobody was getting the message. Especially if I held a degree in communications.

Once you understand that Palin's only actual message is the importance of loving and understanding Palin, it becomes easier to understand why she quit. The more Palin tries to explain herself, the more we all fail to get her. Every time she goes off script, she makes less sense. No wonder she didn't want to do debate prep or be coached by the McCain communications team. Instead of thanking those who packaged, explained, and spun her, Palin resents them. And because she believes she has been crystal clear all along, she's come to resent us, too. The enduring political lesson of Sarah Palin may simply be that for most of her political career she's been lost in translation, without fully appreciating that only in translation was she ever, briefly found.

http://www.slate.com/id/2222523/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-09-09 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. The great irony is that Palin was a Journalism Major lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-09-09 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Doesn't say much about the college's journalism program where she got her degree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-09-09 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I think you mean colleges'
there were 5 of them, as I recall. 5 colleges, 6 years. Or was it 6 years, 5 colleges? Oh, well. Whatever. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-09-09 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. But she only got a degree from one of the colleges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-09-09 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. University of Idaho is not well known academically

Ironically Washington State University, just 30 miles away has one of the nation's best known journalism schools with the Edward R Murrow school.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_R._Murrow_College_of_Communication

If she was interested in Journalism, or if any out of state U of I student had any serious interest in journalism they would have transferred there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-09-09 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. She screeched "You're not listening" at Andrea Mitchell
out her frustration that Mitchell wanted her to clarify something. Palin is a jerk. I'm surprised the media keeps her out in front of us. Palin is tiresome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElboRuum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-09-09 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Interessting observation...
"Dada statements"

You know, I've been searching for the word to describe her expressions because it did so smack of something of some familiarity that I just couldn't place. THAT'S what it was. Dadaist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-09-09 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. And, now Time mag has given her a bigger
pulpit to whine about the Obama admin.

This is a good analysis..thank you. I Rec'd and now it has 0 so somebody on here likes palin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-09-09 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. yes, I think it was the Time article that put me over the edge and made finding this so soothing
Palin is nothing if the media doesn't tell us what she is. Time tells us she might be ahead of her time.

The same was true of Bush, although the press has yet to acknowledge. Bush couldn't sting two words together and the press had to tell us what he meant and that it was brilliant.

I'm afraid "real Americans" are the ones who don't have any critical thinking skills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-09-09 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yeah, the world always did love whiners and quuitters and
blaming their shit on other people.

Something tells me Time needs to be boycotted for that suggestion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC