House Democratic leaders were
planning to unveil a final health care reform bill today, but on the eve of the announcement, a group of “Blue Dog Democrats” released a list of demands that have
forced the leadership to wait until next week as Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer attempt to broker a compromise.
In a letter to Speaker Pelosi, the conservative “Blue Dog” members claimed that they are concerned about the cost of the health care bill:
<...>
But
the letter also comes out against a public plan, which is one of the primary tools to
rein in health care costs over the long-term. The
letter complains, “‘A Medicare-like’ public option would negatively impact hospitals, doctors and patients…using Medicare’s below-market rates would seriously weaken the financial stability of our local hospitals and doctors.”
Igor Volsky notes there’s “
an inherent contradiction” in this letter: the Blue Dogs want to find
more savings within the system, but they’re also asking that the bill spend more.
Fortunately, there is at least one “Blue Dog” member who understands this contradiction and is willing to break from
her coalition to support a public plan. On MSNBC this afternoon, Rep. Loretta Sanchez (D-CA) said, “I am one of those people who believes that we should be required to have a public option because it will bring the costs of health care down.” Watch it:
(Video:
Loretta Sanchez Endorses Public Plan)
Sanchez is right. If the “Blue Dogs” wanted to
stick to their principles of bringing costs down, they’d join with Sanchez to endorse a public plan.