Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pawlenty Garners Attention With Budget Move

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 12:35 PM
Original message
Pawlenty Garners Attention With Budget Move
Edited on Sat Jul-11-09 12:43 PM by question everything
JULY 11, 2009

Pawlenty Garners Attention With Budget Move

By AMY MERRICK
WSJ

With a handful of states struggling to finish their budgets, Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty was adamant about closing his state's $2.7 billion deficit without raising taxes. After vetoing the Democratic-led legislature's bill that called for $1 billion in tax increases, the Republican governor took matters into his own hands. Instead of calling a special legislative session, he hacked at the budget himself, employing an unusual and rarely used "unallotment" law to cut Minnesota's two-year general-fund spending to $31 billion. State agencies began detailing their cuts this week.

The move isn't sitting well with some of Mr. Pawlenty's constituents. Religious leaders organized a protest, a lobbying association for cities considered suing him, and the state Democratic-Farmer-Labor party criticized him for making an end-run around lawmakers. But blocking tax increases is a signature political move for Mr. Pawlenty, who is the subject of growing speculation about a possible presidential run in 2012. He said last month that he won't run for a third term next year. This week, he's been calling for Republicans to restrain federal and state spending. In an interview, Mr. Pawlenty called spending control "the central premise of the revitalization of the Republican party." As for the presidency, "I'm not ruling anything in or out, but I don't know what the future holds for me," he said.

(snip)


Mr. Pawlenty erased much of the deficit by putting off bills, shifting $1.77 billion in payments to K-12 schools. Colleges and universities will lose $100 million in state funds over the next two years, while cities and counties will lose $300 million. The League of Minnesota Cities considered bringing a lawsuit against Mr. Pawlenty. But some league directors feared that even if the group won a court battle and reversed the cuts, cities could end up losing even more money the following year. The board decided not to sue. The league expects cities to cut spending and increase property taxes to compensate for the lost aid, said Gary Carlson, the group's executive director.

Lawmakers in the DFL-controlled legislature condemned Mr. Pawlenty's unilateral move. "The governor gave us two options: We could solve the budget deficit his way, or he would solve the budget deficit his way," said Margaret Anderson Kelliher, the DFL speaker of the state House. Rep. Anderson Kelliher says the legislature will review the governor's unallotments when it reconvenes Feb. 4. But lawmakers could be constrained by the huge deficit, perhaps as much as $7 billion, already predicted for the 2012-2013 biennium. Mr. Pawlenty said a special legislative session would have created gridlock and extra costs for taxpayers.

(snip)

Religious groups protested Mr. Pawlenty's budget cuts June 30. Dressed in black and carrying flowers, hundreds of congregants knelt on the steps of the state capitol and left letters urging the governor to reverse his decision. The Rev. Grant Abbott, executive director of the Saint Paul Area Council of Churches, said he expected more families who have lost access to health care to show up at the homeless shelters operated by religious organizations. This month, the group expanded from offering 40 beds and six cribs each night to 60 beds and nine cribs. Mr. Pawlenty said he would consider a compromise on the health-care program, which was set to expire after the legislature reconvenes. He acknowledged his budget cuts would make some citizens' lives more difficult, but said, "I think it is consistent with what society is going through generally."



http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124727136151226031.html (subscription)


:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. And he's not cutting taxes to people because cities & school districts have had to increase their
levies on property taxes to make up for his cuts. If he tries a presidential run, there will be a lot to drag out against him. startribune.com will be one resource, but http://minnesotaindependent.com/ is an even better source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShadowLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. This is exactly the kind of 'solution' the fridge radical right wanted that he's playing up to
Pawlenty knows that the antitax club for growth and radical economic conservatives hit Huckabee relentlessly for raising taxes as governor because he had no choices from a series of events that lowered tax revenue and required more spending (such as a state supreme court ruling forcing him to increase spending on education in minority districts, and a recession hurting tax revenue, not to mention Huckabee wanted to spend some extra money to fix his state's roads, which at the time were among the worst in the nation most needing repairs).

This is Pawlenty's 'solution' to satisfy them and win their votes in 2012.

Disgusting, it's groups like the antitax club for growth that are most responsible for our current budget mess and massive deficits at the federal level, trying to force politicians into pursuing unrealistic solutions that won't work, or will do far more damage then tax increases would have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Or, that Huckabee actually cares about the poor and the elderly
and, at some point, sounded like (pre affair) Edwards.

No, they want to keep tax low and let the young, the poor and the elderly just drop dead.

Hey, why not bring back slavery while we are at this?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC