Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why did Obama appoint a "compensation czar"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 09:51 PM
Original message
Why did Obama appoint a "compensation czar"?
Edited on Sat Jul-11-09 09:52 PM by brentspeak
He needs to create a brand-new post to negotiate bonuses with crooks who should, in any sane world, be tossed out on their ears? What part of 'no!' is hard to understand?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/11/AR2009071100419.html">Oh, no! If AIG executives don't get their bonuses, they might quit!

Could you imagine, say, Truman's response to some slimeball AIG exec demanding millions of taxpayer dollars?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. To piss you off yet again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. LOL.
Billo hates all the Czars as well. Maybe they need to get together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Does this happen often? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Excellent
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. "A public furor erupted earlier this year when AIG paid about $165 million in retention bonuses..."
Yeah everyone, including the media, was attacking the Dems for trying to get the money back and pass legislation prohibiting them from paying bonuses.

Well, they got their wish.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Exactly and I bet that won't be mentioned.
Edited on Sat Jul-11-09 09:59 PM by Kdillard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Most AIG divisions were profitable,
and many valuable employees are paid largely in performance-based compensation--that is to say, bonuses. To declare that a statistician whose intelligent, committed work made the company $20 million oughtn't get paid because an exec in a different department bought himself a new boat is a bit silly. In order to determine the difference between fair compensation for work and pork for slimeballs, Obama appointed a czar.

You're probably the only person on DU who could complain about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. ^^^What you said^^^ (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 03:57 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Bank Holding Companies
GLB undid what FDR and his Cabinet fixed 70 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. To give you another bogus non-issue to attempt to bash him over
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
9. People were complaining about executive compensation, so he appointed a czar to mollify them.
Just because it didn't work on you doesn't mean it didn't work. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-11-09 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
13. To make your head asplode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC