Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Administration Bridles at Bar on Contractors

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 09:09 PM
Original message
Administration Bridles at Bar on Contractors
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/15/AR2009071503415.html?hpid=moreheadlines

The Obama administration has objected to a provision in the 2010 defense funding bill currently before the Senate that would bar the military's use of contractors to interrogate detainees.

The provision, strongly backed by Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl M. Levin (D-Mich.), describes interrogations as an "inherently governmental function" that "cannot be transferred to contractor personnel." It would give the Defense Department one year from the bill's enactment to ensure that the military had the resources to comply with it.

A White House policy statement yesterday signaled "many areas of agreement" with the bill that emerged from Levin's committee late last month but said the administration has "serious concerns" about some provisions. The statement repeated Obama's threat to veto the $680 billion bill unless $1.75 billion to fund an additional seven F-22 fighter aircraft is removed.

(snip)
The contractor interrogation issue is the latest challenge to the White House as it tries to fashion a policy on current and future detainees. It comes as the administration is struggling to address demands by human rights organizations, members of Congress and even some within its own ranks, to fully investigate and make public actions taken by the Bush administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. The administration needs to avoid contractors at all costs when using interrogators.
Or any personnel associated with interrogators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting precedent.
I suppose most people don't realize this, but there are a *VAST* number of intelligence functions, military actions, questionable research (etc.) that government employees aren't legally allowed to (or trained to) do, but private contractors can be "hired" to accomplish.

Maybe Levin's trying to boil the frog one degree at a time, or maybe he realizes how fast our entire defense system would come crashing down if we stopped using mercenaries of all kinds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC