Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

firefighters testifying now on sotomayor.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RepublicanElephant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 02:03 PM
Original message
firefighters testifying now on sotomayor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RepublicanElephant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. can you ever take a minority republican seriously on civil rights,
linda chavez?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks..n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RepublicanElephant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. the "reverse discrimination" crowd is truly insulting in the way they assume...
that minorities/women just don't study hard enough,

and that tests can't be culturally biased to give certain applicants an advantage.

these new haven guys don't seem to wonder why every fire dept in the country isn't going through what they are.

maybe these other tests are more fairly designed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. But you can bet that if things had turned out the other way and only black firefighters had passed
Edited on Thu Jul-16-09 03:41 PM by EffieBlack
the test and no white firefighters had made the cut, these folks would have been singing an entirely different tune!

As Pat Buchanan demonstrated a couple of months ago when he bleated and hollered about the fact that no white men were among the finalists for the Supreme Court vacancy:

BUCHANAN: You got down to four women, not a single white male — all women.

NORAH O’DONNELL: Did it ever occur to you, Pat, that maybe there weren’t any white men who were qualified?

BUCHANAN: Yes. No, it did not occur to me. You mean there are no white males qualified? That would be an act of bigotry to make a statement like that. <...>

LAWRENCE O’DONNELL: Well Pat, if it gets down to four, you’re suggesting it’s an absolute outrage if the final four are women. If got down to final four and they were all white men, would that bother you in the least?

BUCHANAN: I don’t say it’s an outrage, I say it’s affirmative action. They were picked because she’s a woman and a Hispanic and you know it as well as I do.


Don't you love it? According to Buchanan and his buddies, the absence of any white men in an employment pool is proof of bigotry while, on the other hand, the absence of any black people in an employment pool just means that the white people are smarter and tried harder - and any complaint from the black people about it is a bigoted attack on white people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RepublicanElephant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. buchanan, like most repubs, was born 100 years too late. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oh, and lookey who else crawled out from under a rock . . . Linda Chavez
:puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC