Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sen. Baucus at it again: Tax employee health benefits to raise $32 billion a year.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 07:35 PM
Original message
Sen. Baucus at it again: Tax employee health benefits to raise $32 billion a year.
Edited on Thu Jul-16-09 08:05 PM by denem
Democrat: Obama slowing down progress on health care reform

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Obama's opposition to taxing employer-provided health benefits has slowed progress on passing a health care reform bill, the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee complained Thursday. Sen. Max Baucus says lawmakers need to come up with $320 billion over the coming decade for health care.

"Basically, the president is not helping us," said Sen. Max Baucus, D-Montana, after emerging from closed talks on the bill.

Baucus' criticism came on the same day the head of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said the health reform bills moving through Congress won't reduce long-term health care costs, in part because the bills don't include taxes on health benefits.

The comments by budget office director Douglas Elmendorf provided ammunition for Republican opponents of the two Democratic-sponsored measures made public so far, one passed Wednesday by the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee and one proposed this week by House Democrats.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/07/16/senate.health.benefits/

To find $32 billion a year, Baucus wants to adopt McCain's suicidal proposal from the 2008 election. The policy Obama, Biden and Clinton would not have a bar of. Fuck him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sasquatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Crack the whip, get those doughgies in line
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Baucus should have nicely been told to step aside while he still had
some credibility. Why is he still in charge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. I dont get insurance where I work, so if I want to buy it, I have to with taxed income
If we are getting a good product, I dont have a problem being taxed for it, so why should anyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. We should be taxed for it
Edited on Fri Jul-17-09 01:47 PM by DrToast
Obama did a disservice by railing on that idea last fall. A lot of very smart people of all ideologies are for taxing health care benefits.

It won't happen, though. It's too unpopular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hey how about
we end the wars. Problem solved, along with a lot of others. Fucking idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. $30 billion a year? Seriously??
Whack it out of defense. That is chicken feed in that budget.

Senator Baucus - YOU are not helping anybody and I'd swear you were trying to kill the entire bill with a tax you know everybody will hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluethruandthru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I think the Bush administration "lost" that much every year!
How about getting rid of Blackwater? What'll that save?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. Funding fight rams up. Panels approves House Plan 26 - 22, 23 -18.
Baccus proposals unlikely to survive reconciliation, if that.

House Panels Approve Health Plans

WASHINGTON — The House Committee on Education and Labor approved legislation on Friday morning to remake the nation’s health care system by a vote of 26 to 22. Three Democrats crossed party lines and voted against the bill — Jason Altmire of Pennsylvania, Jared Polis of Colorado and Dina Titus of Nevada.

The vote came eight hours after the House Ways and Means Committee approved the measure, 23 to 18, with three Democrats voting no. The dissident Democrats were Ron Kind of Wisconsin, Earl Pomeroy of North Dakota and John Tanner of Tennessee.

Democrats who voted against the bill cited such concerns as the tax increases, their effect on small businesses and the possibility that a new government-run health insurance plan might underpay doctors and hospitals by using Medicare reimbursement rates.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/18/health/policy/18health.html?hp

Of the five Congressional committees working on the legislation, three have now approved it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
9. What needs to be done is to sunset the Bush tax cuts. Let them expire.
If we do that, we could use that revenue to pay for some health benefits.

I also agree that McCain had some good idea about taxing benefits. That's how it's done in England, Canada and every society with nationalized or socialized medicine. The citizens of these countries like what they have because they know that they are receiving quality healthcare.

I would for the federal government and taxes are taken out to pay for my high-option Blue Cross-Blue Shield PPO plan. I pay about $26 every pay period. Why can't Americans exercise that option if they want?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. They expire automatically in 2010
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Good. They should not be renewed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC