Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The IMAC Proposal: Obama's Answer on Cost Control

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 09:58 AM
Original message
The IMAC Proposal: Obama's Answer on Cost Control
The IMAC Proposal: Obama's Answer on Cost Control


As discussed below, the administration is pushing its idea to create an "Independent Medicare Advisory Commission" that would set payment policies within Medicare, subject to approval by the President and Congress. The idea is similar to a proposal West Virginia Senator Jay Rockefeller, a Democrat, has been circulating. Today, the administation formally submitted its proposal as a bill. Below is a letter from Budget Director Peter Orszag, explaining the proposal; it went to the leadership and relevant committee chairs in both houses. And below that is an official summary of the legislation:

As you are well aware, soaring health care costs make our current course unsustainable--for both our families and our businesses. Moreover, the ever-increasing cost of Medicare and Medicaid are among the main drivers of long-term budget deficits that are threatening our economic future. Fortunately, because of your hard work and the efforts of your colleagues, we are now closer to the goal of fiscally responsible health care reform than we ever have been.

We agree that it is critical that health care reform is not only deficit neutral over the next decade, but that it does not add to our deficits thereafter. That is why the President, in his June 3, 2009, letter to Senators Kennedy and Baucus, expressed his openness to ideas about giving special consideration to the recommendations of the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC). One constructive approach to implementing this idea is embodied in legislation introduced by Senator Rockefeller that would make MedPAC an independent Executive Branch agency, empowering it to improve efficiency and performance throughout the Medicare system.

A similar approach to creating a more dynamic and efficient Medicare system is embodied in the attached draft legislation. This draft bill would establish an Independent Medicare Advisory Council (IMAC), which would have the authority to make recommendations to the President on annual Medicare payment rates as well as other reforms. Both the annual payment updates and the broader reforms would be prohibited from increasing the aggregate level of net Medicare expenditures.

This proposed legislation would require the President to approve or disapprove each set of the IMAC’s recommendations as a package. If the President accepts the IMAC’s recommendations, Congress would then have 30 days to intervene with a joint resolution before the Secretary of Health and Human Services is authorized to implement them. If either the President disapproves the recommendations of the IMAC or Congress passes such a joint resolution, the recommendations would be null and void, and current law would remain in effect. The review process would permit intervention if the IMAC’s reforms are not in keeping with the goals of Congress or the President, while retaining autonomy for implementing annual payment updates and other Medicare reforms for the IMAC.

Either the Rockefeller proposal or the attached legislation would represent a critical step forward in creating a health care system that rewards quality, restrains unnecessary costs, and provides better care to more Americans. I respectfully request that you and your Committees consider these proposals as you continue your important work of reforming health care and laying a new foundation for economic growth for our nation.

Sincerely,

Peter R. Orszag

Director, Office of Management and Budget


Official summary of legislation at link:

http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_treatment/archive/2009/07/17/orszag-letter.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Anything except single payer which we know works and provides hassle free care to everyone.
Stop the Bullshit!

Give me some of that single payer.

I don't want all this other crap.

I don't want a public option. I don't want IMAC. I don't want whatever new untried idea someone comes up with who is intent on preserving private health insurance companies.


I want single payer!

Do you here me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sorry, but you're sol on that. Maybe if a plan is accepted state-by-state,
but there's hardly anyone, not even House progressives, who are pushing that because they probably deemed it's not doable at this point. Maybe the public option will lead to single-payer.


Kucinich is the exception, and maybe Sanders. Anyone else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Only the majority of the American people, not that we count for shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC