Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Long Game Strategy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 07:14 PM
Original message
The Long Game Strategy
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2009/07/the_long_game_strategy.html


The Long Game Strategy
Ezra Klein


"It's always darkest before the dawn," goes the old saying. The Washington version is that it's always darkest before the deal. Legislators have a tendency to seem maximally rebellious in the days before a piece of legislation is actually finished. The reason is intuitive enough: That's when threats have an effect. A Blue Dog who talked down health-care reform six months ago couldn't have gotten a quote in his local paper. A Blue Dog who talks it down now gets a front-pager in Politico and a solicitous phone call from Rahm Emmanuel asking what, exactly, would make the bill more appealing.

And as I argued yesterday, I don't even think it's particularly dark. I seem to be rare in having been quite a bit more pessimistic at other points in the process than I am at this juncture. But either way, it's worth making one point on the White House's agonizing decision to largely hold the president in reserve until this week, and its legislative hardball until conference committee: This isn't a new strategy.

In fact, it's a pattern. It was White House officials' approach to stimulus. It was their approach to the summer months of the general election. It was their approach to the months leading up to Iowa in the primary campaign. They have a habit of holding their fire till long after supporters are screaming for them to enter the fray. They have a tendency to take a long view of a project -- whether that project is a campaign or a bill -- and identify the point of, hopefully, maximal impact, and ignore the calls to respond to bad news cycles that precede that chosen moment. That leaves a lot of their allies in agony as they wait for the White House to defend itself, but it's worked pretty well so far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent article. K & R. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. You're a posting machine.
Don't you ever just take a day and watch some game shows or something? :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I'm glad she is.... she helps keep the trolls and disruptors at bay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I'm glad she is, too. Though I may need glasses soon for all the reading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. It does seem that Obama allows the public to get into an angs
before hitting the scene......

because the angs of getting nothing done finally dawns
on us long enough to achieve first, some sort of unity,
and then action on our part.

The public doesn't like partisanship....
but the Republican just offered it up big time,
again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PopSixSquish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The Republicans Always Snatch Defeat From the Jaws of Victory
They just can't help themselves...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. DU is a TERRIFIC example of the kind of "Obama Angst" Klein is talking about
Amazingly, no matter how many times he uses the same strategy, a lot of people here still start flipping out during every major policy debate about Obama's lack of leadership and/or will to take the opposition on. I mean, whatever happened to:









It always seemed to help comfort us during the election. Maybe we need to keep this in mind before the next time we think Obama is adrift and/or has abandoned us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_Horrible Donating Member (173 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. facepalm... I was just saying - "it's like when they almost let the stimulus slip away..." This post
makes my frustration make sense -- I want it to happen now and they're just a lot more patient than me. Which, I suppose, would explain why they're - you know - the boss of this place. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. I found this tidbit hilarious...
"... and a solicitous phone call from Rahm Emmanuel asking what, exactly, would make the bill more appealing."


From all I have heard and read about Rahm Emmanuel, his "solicitous" phonecall would begin with "What the fuck" and end with "you fucker"

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. I laughed when I read your post because of this little
nugget I saw yesterday ;):

http://briefingroom.thehill.com/2009/07/21/emanuels-language-not-improving/

Emanuel's language not improving
@ 3:10 pm by Hill Staff

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), in the process of defending President Barack Obama's leadership on health care reform to reporters on Tuesday, said White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel's well-known penchant hasn't changed now that the administration is a half-year old.

Reid said Emanuel called him twice during lunch on Tuesday to discuss healthcare reform, and apparently peppered his language with expletives.

"I would like to say his language is getting better, but I think it's getting worse," Reid said.

- J. Taylor Rushing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. If I were in Rahm's position I'd be swearing like drunken sailor, too.
The Blue Dog's BS pisses me off!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. LOL! Now I KNOW the author of the article had to have used...
the word 'solicitous' satirically! Even this morning, seeing that word used in conjunction with Rahm Emmanuel sends me into fits of laughter!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Don't forget about a special delivery of rotten fish!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Yep! I confess that the delivery of fish was what immediately came...
to mind when I read the word solicitous along with Rahm's well known reputation for using expletives! I have come to the conclusion the writer of the piece had to be using 'solicitous' satirically, he just HAD to be!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC