Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Good News: Hatch quits health care talks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 01:25 PM
Original message
Good News: Hatch quits health care talks
Another sign of positive progress...

Hatch quits health care talks
By: Carrie Budoff Brown
July 22, 2009 12:51 PM EST

The health care Gang of Seven is now down to six.

Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), one of seven senators involved in bipartisan Finance Committee negotiations, has left the talks.

Hatch informed Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) Wednesday afternoon that he couldn't continue to particpate because there were too many aspects of the bill that he could not back, including the employer mandate, individual mandate, Medicaid expansion and tax increase.

"It is going to be difficult for me to support what they are talking about," Hatch said shortly after he told Baucus on their way to a noon Senate vote.

Democrats have long viewed Hatch's vote as a longshot prospect. But he stuck with the bipartisan talks for weeks, despite regularly criticizing the process and policy.

Hatch said he told Baucus he would try to be helpful, but he couldn't stay in the talks under "false pretenses."

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/25268.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. He was staying under "false pretenses" to begin with....
or else he thinks we are stupid!

Bu-bye! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Hatch was the crucial Republicn willing to work with Kenendy on SCHIP in 1997
At that point, there were 55 Republicans in the Senate. Without him, SCHIP, which he sponsored with Kennedy would not have happened,

What this likely means though is that a bipartisan bill is not likely. It makes no sense to give all kinds of concessions to the Republicans and maybe get around 2 more votes - meaning it still passes only under reconciliation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. More "NO" from the party of no
So he is against all of those issues, but what is he for? What are any of them for? On any subject, the GOP does not have any alternatives. They are the party of the status quo - because it works for them.

I hope Pres. Obama rips them a new one in his speech tonight. This is ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Orrin just pees in whatever pool he swims in
good riddance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That would be the shallow end of the gene pool. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GentryDixon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. My Senator knows how to toe his party line.
Good riddance. We do not need his Mormon condescending voice on this issue. :puke: Anyone from Utah knows the voice I am talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC